Finding dipole moment / Electric Field Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the dipole moment in the context of an electric field problem involving charged semicircular arcs. Participants are exploring the relationship between charge distribution and dipole moment, as well as the implications of charge separation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formula for dipole moment and question the presence of charge separation. There are attempts to set up integrals for calculating the dipole moment, with some participants suggesting different coordinate systems and integration limits. Others express uncertainty about the correct representation of charge density and the implications for their calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various approaches being explored. Some participants have provided guidance on rewriting integrals and clarifying the vector nature of the dipole moment. There is a recognition of the need for careful consideration of charge density and integration variables.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available regarding charge density and distribution. There is an emphasis on understanding the relationships between variables rather than arriving at a final solution.

puggleboy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Problem 3 from the attached photo

Homework Equations


p = qd

The Attempt at a Solution


I know the magnitude of the dipole moment is p = qd, where d is the distance between the 2 oppositely charged particles. I know the direction of the dipole moment vector is from - to +. My first thought is there's no charge separation, and hence a dipole moment equals zero. Something tells me this isn't the case.
 

Attachments

  • physics.png
    physics.png
    97 KB · Views: 473
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know why you think there is no charge separation. Some charges are R√2 from the nearest opposite charge. Only where the two semicircles meet is there no separation.
 
Something like p = ∫dp = ∫∫dq⋅dr, where 0 ≤ r ≤ R ?
 
Taulant Sholla said:
Something like p = ∫dp = ∫∫dq⋅dr, where 0 ≤ r ≤ R ?
The charges are along arcs, not distributed over semicircular areas, so I don't see how you get a double integral.
 
What if I setup like this (attached), using:
p = ∫dp = q∫2y = 2q∫(R2-x2)0.5dx from R to -R? Don't I need to differentialize Q somehow?
 

Attachments

  • Picture1.jpg
    Picture1.jpg
    10.5 KB · Views: 383
Taulant Sholla said:
What if I setup like this (attached), using:
p = ∫dp = q∫2y = 2q∫(R2-x2)0.5dx from R to -R? Don't I need to differentialize Q somehow?
That integral should work, but you will find it easier in polar coordinates. I don't know what you mean by "differentialize Q".
 
So, using...
Picture2.jpg

...would we use d = charge separation = 2R, not d=R?

So, p = ∫dp = ∫d(dq) = ∫(2R)dq = ∫(2R)[λRdθ]

Where λ=Q/s, so Q = λs, or dq=λds=λRdθ, resulting in...

So, p = 2λR2∫dθ from pi to -pi?

This isn't feeling right since nothing is mentioned about charge density...??
 
Taulant Sholla said:
So, using...
View attachment 95140
...would we use d = charge separation = 2R, not d=R?

So, p = ∫dp = ∫d(dq) = ∫(2R)dq = ∫(2R)[λRdθ]

Where λ=Q/s, so Q = λs, or dq=λds=λRdθ, resulting in...

So, p = 2λR2∫dθ from pi to -pi?

This isn't feeling right since nothing is mentioned about charge density...??
No, the integral you have now won't work. The dipole moment is a vector. Integration is a sum, so when you integrate vectors you need that sum to reflect vector addition. Your diagram above pairs charges in such a way that the dipoles willpoint in different directions.
Your previous way of pairing them was fine, and so was the integral you wrote down. You just need to rewrite that integral in polar form.
 
That was my attempt at re-writing in polar form... which apparently is incorrect. I'm staring at...
Picture1.jpg

If I try x=Rcosθ, y=Rsinθ
  1. p = ∫dp
  2. = ∫(Q)(2y)
  3. = 2Q∫Rsinθdθ
  4. = -2QRcosθ
  5. eval'd from 0 to pi?
For #2, don't I need a variable of integration? If I use dy, rather than y, I'd get a sine term in #4, which would result in an answer of zero - which I'm pretty sure isn't correct?
Also, still doesn't seem like I'm capturing the charge, Q, correctly via this method?
 
  • #10
Unless I integrate from π/2 to -π/2... ?
 
  • #11
ρρ
Taulant Sholla said:
That was my attempt at re-writing in polar form... which apparently is incorrect. I'm staring at...
View attachment 95142
If I try x=Rcosθ, y=Rsinθ
  1. p = ∫dp
  2. = ∫(Q)(2y)
  3. = 2Q∫Rsinθdθ
  4. = -2QRcosθ
  5. eval'd from 0 to pi?
For #2, don't I need a variable of integration? If I use dy, rather than y, I'd get a sine term in #4, which would result in an answer of zero - which I'm pretty sure isn't correct?
Also, still doesn't seem like I'm capturing the charge, Q, correctly via this method?
In line 2, Q is the charge on a small element of arc, ρRdθ.
In line 3, you have correctly left the dθ inside the integral, so the Q outside is now ρR.
Other than that, your steps 1 to 5 are correct. It does not give zero.
 
  • #12
okay - thank you *very* much for all your help!
 
  • #13
Taulant Sholla said:
okay - thank you *very* much for all your help!
You are welcome. What was your final answer? Bear in mind that you were given the total charge on each arc, not the charge density.
 
  • #14
Right. I assume I'd use:
  1. ρ= Q/s
  2. = Q/(2πR)/2, or
  3. ρ = Q/(πR)?
 
  • #15
Taulant Sholla said:
Right. I assume I'd use:
  1. ρ= Q/s
  2. = Q/(2πR)/2, or
  3. ρ = Q/(πR)?
Good.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K