Finding Direction of Vector A: M & N Intersect Perpendicularly

  • Thread starter Thread starter phiby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Vector
AI Thread Summary
Vectors M and N intersect perpendicularly, and vector A can be defined as either orthogonal to both or perpendicular to the plane formed by M and N. However, without specific orientation details, the direction of A remains ambiguous, as both scenarios allow for two opposite vectors. The order of M and N does not affect the direction of A, as orientation is crucial for determining the resultant vector. The right-hand rule can be applied to visualize the cross product, emphasizing the importance of vector ordering. Understanding these concepts requires a deeper exploration of vector calculus and geometric algebra.
phiby
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Given this line

M & N are two vectors which intersect and are perpendicular to each other.

1) Chose A to be orthogonal to N & M.

or

2) Chose A to be perpendicular to the plane in which both M & N lie.

Do the above descriptions indicate the direction of A - i.e. there are 2 possible directions.
Do either of these descriptions give the direction of A? i.e. for a plane, there are 2 opposite vectors which can both be considered perpendicular to the plane.

In either of these (1 & 2), does changing the order of M and N indicate a different direction?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
no

no
 
algebrat said:
no

no

Why?
 
ME_student said:
Why?

Because you have not supplied any orientation details. You would only have a direction if you supplied a specific orientation.

The cross product can be visualized using the right hand rule where your first vector is your thumb, the second your fingers and the result will be in the direction extending from your palm outward.

In this particular case, the orientation is not just the vectors themselves, but the ordering of those vectors that correspond to their placement in the cross product.

Once you specify an orientation, you will then have the orientation for the surface (i.e. the plane), but until then, you don't have an orientation.

If you want to understand orientation, you can read books on vector calculus and geometric algebra and they will give you a deeper insight into this, but for the time being just be aware that unless you provide an orientation, you won't be able to determine what you need to determine.
 
Wry smile :biggrin: as 'Chiro' expounds on 'Chirality'.

Note also that depending upon your definition of vector there are possibly many vectors satisfying condition 2 as you have not specified concurrency.
 
chiro said:
Because you have not supplied any orientation details. You would only have a direction if you supplied a specific orientation.

The cross product can be visualized using the right hand rule where your first vector is your thumb, the second your fingers and the result will be in the direction extending from your palm outward.

In this particular case, the orientation is not just the vectors themselves, but the ordering of those vectors that correspond to their placement in the cross product.

Once you specify an orientation, you will then have the orientation for the surface (i.e. the plane), but until then, you don't have an orientation.

If you want to understand orientation, you can read books on vector calculus and geometric algebra and they will give you a deeper insight into this, but for the time being just be aware that unless you provide an orientation, you won't be able to determine what you need to determine.


I was just curious. We recently touched up on Vectors in my math course a bit.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top