Finding electric field intensity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field intensity at point B due to three point charges: q1 = 2C, q2 = -4C, and q3 = -2C. The formula used for electric field intensity is E = (1/4πε0)(q/r³)r, with ε0 = 8.854 × 10-12 Farads/m. Participants clarify that the charges should be in nanocoulombs (nC) rather than coulombs (C), and they discuss the correct method for finding the resultant electric field intensity, emphasizing vector subtraction and the significance of angles between vectors. The final resultant electric field intensity is calculated to be approximately 31.248 N/C.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric field intensity and Coulomb's law
  • Familiarity with vector addition and subtraction
  • Knowledge of units of charge (Coulombs vs. nanocoulombs)
  • Basic grasp of trigonometry for resolving vector components
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Coulomb's law in electrostatics
  • Learn about vector addition and subtraction in physics
  • Explore the implications of charge units in electric field calculations
  • Investigate the role of angles in vector resolution and resultant calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, as well as anyone involved in solving problems related to electric fields and forces.

Prathamesh
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
3 point charges q1 q2 & q3 are placed in vacuum as shown.
Find electric field intensity at B,if q1=2C,q2=-4C & q3=-2C
queimg.jpg


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
First find the electric field intensity at the point due individual charges, then find the resultant.

Note:
Electric field intensity due to a charge q at a distance r in the direction of r is given by
E=(1/4πε0)(q/r3)r
ε0=8.854×10-12 Farads/m
 
  • Like
Likes Prathamesh
I have tried it up to this...
Is it right ?
If yes , what to do next and how?
Plz help
 

Attachments

  • Snapshot.jpg
    Snapshot.jpg
    22.6 KB · Views: 479
phoenix95 said:
First find the electric field intensity at the point due individual charges, then find the resultant.

Note:
Electric field intensity due to a charge q at a distance r in the direction of r is given by
E=(1/4πε0)(q/r3)r
ε0=8.854×10-12 Farads/m
Thank you!
But while finding resultant vector , can I first find resultant of intensity (E') due to q2 & q3 and then simply subtract intensity due to q1 (E1) from E'(though E' is not exactly opposite to E1)?
 
Hey, are you sure the units of charge are in C, not nC or anything?
If it is C, then the Es you calculated are wrong... You have write it in terms powers of ten, otherwise use the correct units. (Keep in mind the electrostatic force due to one coulomb of charge is extremely large:smile:)

Prathamesh said:
But while finding resultant vector , can I first find resultant of intensity (E') due to q2 & q3 and then simply subtract intensity due to q1 (E1) from E'(though E' is not exactly opposite to E1)?
Keeping in mind the directions of Es, that is a correct way to do it...:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Prathamesh
phoenix95 said:
Hey, are you sure the units of charge are in C, not nC or anything?
If it is C, then the Es you calculated are wrong... You have write it in terms powers of ten, otherwise use the correct units. (Keep in mind the electrostatic force due to one coulomb of charge is extremely large:smile:)Keeping in mind the directions of Es, that is a correct way to do it...:smile:

Yeah... sorry , Charges are in nC.

so , finding resultant is like this? In solutions it is given that even there is angle θ(θ≠180) between 2 vectors , simply subtract them...
I didnt understand that...
 

Attachments

  • Snapshot1.jpg
    Snapshot1.jpg
    11 KB · Views: 429
Prathamesh said:
so , finding resultant is like this?
Yes.

Prathamesh said:
In solutions it is given that even there is angle θ(θ≠180) between 2 vectors , simply subtract them...
I didnt understand that...
First see if you get the correct resultant :smile:. I didn't catch the 'angle' thing... If you get correct answer then will you please post what exactly the solution says? I'll try my best to explain...
 
  • Like
Likes Prathamesh
phoenix95 said:
Yes.First see if you get the correct resultant :smile:. I didn't catch the 'angle' thing... If you get correct answer then will you please post what exactly the solution says? I'll try my best to explain...

Solution says after finding E' (which comes 18*√5=40.248N/C) to get final result subtract E1 (9N/C) from it. Thus final result becomes 31.248 N/C.
But I think,to get final result vector sum of E' and E1 should be done which gives final result =√1620+81+2*18√5*9*cosθ=√ 1701+362.232cosθ
 
  • Like
Likes phoenix95
Prathamesh said:
Solution says after finding E' (which comes 18*√5=40.248N/C) to get final result subtract E1 (9N/C) from it. Thus final result becomes 31.248 N/C.
But I think,to get final result vector sum of E' and E1 should be done which gives final result =√1620+81+2*18√5*9*cosθ=√ 1701+362.232cosθ
Correct. :smile: In order do what the solution says, the vectors E' and E1 have to be exactly opposite. You are right.:smile:
 
  • #10
since cosθ comes -0.94≈-1 , it is approximately same as subtracting E1 from E' ...
Thank you...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
959
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K