Finding Electric Field of Two Charges

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
erok81
Messages
454
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There is a charge Q=1 μC located at x=0 and a charge -Q/2 located at x=4 m. What is the E-field.

At what value of x is the E-field zero? Express your answer in meters and do not approximate decimals digits.

Homework Equations



[itex]E=\frac{q_1 q_2 k_c}{r^2}[/itex]

Removing the test charge:

[itex]\frac{E}{q}=\frac{q_n k_c}{r^2}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have this solved, but I am going wrong somewhere and can't see my mistake. Here is my work and the correct final answer.

To find the E field at x=100, E1-E2=0. E2 is being subtracted due to q2 being negative.

This gives E1=E2

[itex]\frac{q_1 k_c}{r^2}=\frac{q_2 k_c}{(r-4^2)}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{(r-4)^2}{r^2}=\frac{q_2 k_c}{q_1 k_c}[/itex]

[itex]\left(\frac{(r-4)}{r}\right)^2=\frac{q_2 k_c}{q_1 k_c}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{r-4}{r}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_2}{q_1}}[/itex]

[itex]1-\frac{4}{r}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_2}{q_1}}[/itex]

[itex]-1\left(-\frac{4}{r}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_2}{q_1}} -1\right)[/itex]

[itex]\frac{4}{r}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_2}{q_1}} +1[/itex]

[itex]\frac{r}{4}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_1}{q_2}} +1[/itex]

[itex]r= \left(\pm \sqrt{\frac{q_1}{q_2}} +1\right)4[/itex]

[itex]r= \pm 4\sqrt{\frac{q_1}{q_2}} +4[/itex]

[itex]r= 4 \pm 4\sqrt{\frac{1}{0.5}}[/itex]

[itex]r= 4 + 4 \sqrt{2}[/itex]


But that isn't correct. That isn't the correct answer. The correct answer is:

[itex]r= 8 + 4 \sqrt{2}[/itex]

Where does the extra factor of 2 come from making the 4 an 8?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
erok81 said:

Homework Statement



There is a charge Q=1 μC located at x=0 and a charge -Q/2 located at x=4 m. What is the E-field.

At what value of x is the E-field zero? Express your answer in meters and do not approximate decimals digits.

Homework Equations



[itex]E=\frac{q_1 q_2 k_c}{r^2}[/itex]

Removing the test charge:

[itex]\frac{E}{q}=\frac{q_n k_c}{r^2}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have this solved, but I am going wrong somewhere and can't see my mistake. Here is my work and the correct final answer.

To find the E field at x=100, E1-E2=0. E2 is being subtracted due to q2 being negative.

This gives E1=E2

[itex]\frac{q_1 k_c}{r^2}=\frac{q_2 k_c}{(r-4^2)}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{(r-4)^2}{r^2}=\frac{q_2 k_c}{q_1 k_c}[/itex]

[itex]\left(\frac{(r-4)}{r}\right)^2=\frac{q_2 k_c}{q_1 k_c}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{r-4}{r}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_2}{q_1}}[/itex]

[itex]1-\frac{4}{r}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_2}{q_1}}[/itex]

[itex]-1\left(-\frac{4}{r}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_2}{q_1}} -1\right)[/itex]

[itex]\frac{4}{r}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_2}{q_1}} +1[/itex]

[itex]\frac{r}{4}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_1}{q_2}} +1[/itex]

You made a mistake. The red line is wrong.

ehild
 
I am assuming I can't take the inverse of that thing like I did?

Would the more appropriate solution to cross multiply everything to get r alone?
 
hi erok81! :smile:
erok81 said:
Would the more appropriate solution to cross multiply everything to get r alone?

that'll still leave you with the problem of what the inverse of the RHS is :redface:

hint: 1 = √q1/√q1 :wink:
 
Last edited:
erok81 said:
I am assuming I can't take the inverse of that thing like I did?

Would the more appropriate solution to cross multiply everything to get r alone?


You can not. Try it with numbers: if 1/r = 2/3 +1
=5/3
is r=3/2 +1
=5/2?
?

You can take the reciprocal of both sides of an equation if neither sides can be zero. If

4/r =a+b

then

r/4=1/(a+b)

Multiply both sides by 4:

r=4/(a+b)

Your equation is

[tex]\frac{4}{r}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_2}{q_1}} +1[/tex]

Substitute the numerical values of the charges q2=Q/2 and q1=Q.

[tex]\frac{4}{r}= \pm \sqrt{1/2} +1[/tex]

Take the reciprocal of both sides.


ehild