Finding Electric Potential Difference in a TV Tube

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the electric potential difference in a TV tube, where electrons are accelerated towards a screen and have a specified wavelength just before impact. The subject area pertains to electromagnetism and wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relevant equations for calculating electric potential difference and question the appropriateness of the derived equations. There are inquiries about the units of wavelength and their implications for the calculations. Some participants express confusion regarding the units and the expected results.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's work and clarifying the importance of units in calculations. There is a focus on ensuring that the derived equations are correct and that the units align properly. Some participants have expressed confidence in their approaches, while others are still seeking clarification.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of significant digits and the need to ensure that calculations do not require relativistic considerations. Participants also note the importance of understanding the distinction between electric potential difference in volts and energy in electronvolts.

julianwitkowski
Messages
133
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a TV tube, an electric potential difference accelerates electrons from a rest positive towards a screen. Just before striking the screen, the electrons have a wavelength of 1.0⋅10-10. Find the electric potential difference.

Homework Equations


[/B]
Should I use these?

\Delta V = \frac{Work}{Charge}

λ= \frac{h}{\sqrt{2⋅m⋅E}}

The Attempt at a Solution



substituting/simplifying I came to: \Delta V = \frac{h^2}{2⋅e⋅m⋅λ^2}

Would this best the correct equation to find the answer?

***Corrected the 'E' implying energy to 'e' for elementary charge

Thanks for your time and help,
Julian
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
julianwitkowski said:
In a TV tube, an electric potential difference accelerates electrons from a rest positive towards a screen. Just before striking the screen, the electrons have a wavelength of 1.0⋅10-10. Find the electric potential difference.
1.0⋅10-10 what? Miles? Astronomical units? Watermelons?

:smile: Be sure to include units for every numerical data value!

The equation that you arrived at looks to be okay. Not sure how you got there from your Relevant Equations though o_O
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: julianwitkowski
Sorry about my units... :nb)

Since λ= \frac{h}{\sqrt{2⋅m⋅E}} → E= \frac{h^2}{\sqrt{2⋅m⋅λ}}

I reckon: ΔV = \frac{E}{e} = \frac{(\frac{h^2}{\sqrt{2⋅m⋅λ}})}{e} = ΔV = \frac{h^2}{\sqrt{2⋅m⋅e⋅λ}}
 
Last edited:
gneill said:
1.0⋅10-10

The equation that you arrived at looks to be okay. Not sure how you got there from your Relevant Equations though o_O
 
I was looking at this and my second algebra is terrible... I meant to write this but I was awake for way too long.Since λ= \frac{h}{\sqrt{2⋅m⋅E}} → E= \frac{h^2}{2⋅m⋅λ^2}

ΔV = \frac{E}{e} = \frac{(\frac{h^2}{2⋅m⋅λ^2})}{e} = \frac{h^2}{2⋅m⋅e⋅λ^2}
 
Good. You've shown your work and it looks fine to me :smile:

Now, what are the units of the wavelength you've been given? It matters because it will determine the magnitude of the velocity of the electron; you need to be sure that the speed is low enough that relativistic equations aren't required (as it turns out they aren't here, but it is something you should check for every time).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: julianwitkowski
gneill said:
Good. You've shown your work and it looks fine to me :smile:

Now, what are the units of the wavelength you've been given? It matters because it will determine the magnitude of the velocity of the electron; you need to be sure that the speed is low enough that relativistic equations aren't required (as it turns out they aren't here, but it is something you should check for every time).

It's meters, and thanks for your help I mostly needed to make sure it was right before I put in the numbers; that's the easy part :p.
 
gneill said:
Good. You've shown your work and it looks fine to me :smile:

Now, what are the units of the wavelength you've been given? It matters because it will determine the magnitude of the velocity of the electron; you need to be sure that the speed is low enough that relativistic equations aren't required (as it turns out they aren't here, but it is something you should check for every time).

Question about significant digits... Is this one significant digit because the question is 1.0⋅10-10m?
 
I wouldn't worry and quote 150 V: If someone gives 1.0 then in principle you are to assume it's in the range 0.95 - 1.05, so 1.5 102 V would be a good answer.

Sure, the numbers are the easy part. If you found 150 V like I did (did you ?) I suppose that's what the exercise wants.

(But that is a funny kind of TV: I seem to remember a color TV has some 25 kV as accelerating voltage. Perhaps they wanted to make sure you wouldn't worry about relativistic corrections... )

--
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: julianwitkowski
  • #10
BvU said:
I wouldn't worry and quote 150 V: If someone gives 1.0 then in principle you are to assume it's in the range 0.95 - 1.05, so 1.5 102 V would be a good answer.

Sure, the numbers are the easy part. If you found 150 V like I did (did you ?) I suppose that's what the exercise wants.

(But that is a funny kind of TV: I seem to remember a color TV has some 25 kV as accelerating voltage. Perhaps they wanted to make sure you wouldn't worry about relativistic corrections... )

--
...and wait, isn't electric potential diff in eV.. I jump at the conclusion due to the ΔV symbol and as eV's seem to be standard in this study? ... Thanks for pointing that out.
 
  • #11
julianwitkowski said:
...and wait, isn't electric potential diff in eV.. I jump at the conclusion due to the ΔV symbol and as eV's seem to be standard in this study? ... Thanks for pointing that out.
Electric potential difference has units of Volts, which is equivalent to Joules per Coulomb. eV is a unit of energy alone, i.e. some number of Joules.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: julianwitkowski
  • #12
julianwitkowski said:
...and wait, isn't electric potential diff in eV.. I jump at the conclusion due to the ΔV symbol and as eV's seem to be standard in this study? ... Thanks for pointing that out.

I need to learn to read still...
 
  • #13
BvU, you're honestly a tank. Thanks dude.
 
  • #14
BvU said:
I wouldn't worry and quote 150 V: If someone gives 1.0 then in principle you are to assume it's in the range 0.95 - 1.05, so 1.5 102 V would be a good answer.
--

But why the heck does the equation render a value within the realm of the centi-volt? I pull 15078.5 from the equation but I'm not sure the units,

and if you say its 150 volts, I'm in a new place of confusion.
 
  • #15
Thank you for the critical thinking exercise.
 
  • #16
julianwitkowski said:
But why the heck does the equation render a value within the realm of the centi-volt? I pull 15078.5 from the equation but I'm not sure the units,
Start by writing out the values of all the variables and constants that you are using in the equation. Make sure that they all have compatible units (i.e. don't mix meters and centimeters and so on). You will be able to find the final units if you combine/cancel them as your calculation proceeds.
 
  • #17
gneill said:
Start by writing out the values of all the variables and constants that you are using in the equation. Make sure that they all have compatible units (i.e. don't mix meters and centimeters and so on). You will be able to find the final units if you combine/cancel them as your calculation proceeds.

I might be doing something wrong here, I tried this a couple of ways but I don't exactly line up with \frac{kg⋅m^2}{A⋅s^3}

I end up with this

\frac{m}{A⋅s^2}
 
Last edited:
  • #18
I'm not sure if you can see where I'm going wrong in my units, I've tried using Plancks constant with J/s too but its also not Volts, although I know it is, but where am I going wrong.
 
  • #19
julianwitkowski said:
I'm not sure if you can see where I'm going wrong in my units, I've tried using Plancks constant with J/s too but its also not Volts, although I know it is, but where am I going wrong.
Please post the values with units. I can tell you right now that the units of h are J s or kg m2/s, not J/s.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: julianwitkowski
  • #20
:smile:I forgot to square the Planck constant and wavelength when working with the units alone... Were all good, thanks for the tip, I thought it might be easier to think about working with the units without numbers but I forgot about the powers of the value to begin.. I certainly see the importance of the actual units now, so I really appreciate everyone here drilling that stuff for me. I love this site.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K