Finding Electrical Field Around a Charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field around a charge. The electric field is determined using the formula E = F/q, resulting in a magnitude of 30 N/C for a 2-coulomb charge experiencing a force of 60 Newtons. For a charge of +3 x 10^-6 coulombs located 9 meters away, the electric field is calculated using E = kQ/r^2, yielding a magnitude of 1 x 10^3 N/C. The direction of the electric field is established as pointing away from the positive charge. This guidance reinforces the application of Coulomb's Law in determining electric fields.
celect
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Can someone let me know if I'm going in the right direction.

The electrical force on a 2-columb charge is 60 Newtons, What iis the magnitude of the electric field?

E =f/q
E= 60/2
E=30





If a charge of +3 x 10 -6columbs sets up an electrical field, find:

a. The magnitude of the field 9 meters away.

b. The directive of the field.

(I don't know how to set this up)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Yes.

2. Use Coloumb's Law.

cookiemonster
 



You are on the right track! The equation for electric field is E = F/q, where E is the electric field, F is the force, and q is the charge. So, for the first question, the magnitude of the electric field is 30 N/C (newtons per coulomb).

For the second question, to find the magnitude of the field at a distance of 9 meters, we can use the equation E = kQ/r^2, where k is the Coulomb's constant (9 x 10^9 Nm^2/C^2), Q is the charge, and r is the distance. Plugging in the values, we get E = (9 x 10^9)(3 x 10^-6)/(9)^2 = 1 x 10^3 N/C.

To find the direction of the electric field, we can use the principle that electric field lines always point away from positive charges and towards negative charges. So, in this case, the electric field lines would point away from the +3 x 10^-6 C charge.

I hope this helps! Keep up the good work.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top