MHB Finding $k$ for 2 Non-Negative Roots of $x^2-2x\lfloor x \rfloor +x-k=0$

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Find all values of $k$ for which the equation $x^2-2x\lfloor x \rfloor +x-k=0$ has two distinct non-negative roots.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Note that for any real number $x$ we always have

$\lfloor x \rfloor \le x < \lfloor x \rfloor +1$

Then putting $\lfloor x \rfloor =y$ and $x-\lfloor x \rfloor=z$ we have

$z^2+z-y^2+y-k=0$, where $y$ is an integer and $z\in [0,\,1)$.

Expressing $z$ in terms of $y$ yields

$z=\dfrac{-1\pm\sqrt{1+4(y^2-y+k}}{2}$.

Since $z\ge 0$, we have

$z=\dfrac{-1+\sqrt{1+4(y^2-y+k)}}{2}$

So $0\le \dfrac{-1+\sqrt{1+4(y^2-y+k)}}{2}<1$, or equivalently,

$0\le y^2-y+k<2$

If $x_1>x_2$ are two distinct non-negative roots of the given equation, then $y_1>y_2$. Indeed, since $\lfloor x_i \rfloor=y_i$ and $x_i-\lfloor x_i \rfloor =z_i$ $(i=1,\,2)$, we have $y_1\ge y_2$. Assume that $y_1=y_2$. In this case, by $z=\dfrac{-1+\sqrt{1+4(y^2-y+k}}{2}$, $z_1=z_2$ and so $x_1=x_2$. This is impossible.

Thus $y_1>y_2$. From $0\le y^2-y+k<2$, it follows that

$|y_1^2-y_1-y_2^2+y_2|<2$, or equivalently,

$(y_1-y_2)|y_1+y_2-1|<2$.

Note that $y_1,\,y_2$ are integers, and so $y_1-y_2\ge 1$. Then the last inequality shows that $|y_1+y_2-1|=0,\,1$.

For $|y_1+y_2-1|=0$: $y_1+y_2=1$ and hence $y_1=1,\,y_2=0$.
For $|y_1+y_2-1|=1$: $y_1+y_2=2$ and hence $y_1=2,\,y_2=0$. But these values do not satisfy $(y_1-y_2)|y_1+y_2-1|<2$.

Thus we see that if the given equation has two non-negative distinct roots $x_1>x_2$, then $\lfloor x_1 \rfloor=1,\,\lfloor x_2 \rfloor=0$. Hence,

$x_1=\dfrac{\sqrt{1+4k}+1}{2},\\x_2=\dfrac{\sqrt{1+4k}-1}{2}$

Obviously, this equation cannot have more than two distinct roots.

Finally, it follows that the possible range of $k$ is $0\le k <2$.
 
Nice!

-Dan
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top