Finding kilograms of water on a spherical planet

AI Thread Summary
To find the mass of water on a spherical planet, one should first calculate the total volume of the sphere using its average radius and the average depth of the oceans. The percentage of the surface covered by oceans is then applied to this volume to determine the volume of water. This volume is multiplied by the average density of water to find the mass in kilograms. Consistent unit usage is crucial throughout the calculations, and online conversion tools can assist with this. The final mass calculated was approximately 3.518x10^16 kg, though the accuracy of this figure was later questioned.
PAstudent
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
(Moderators note: moved from technical forums, does not use template)

How would someone approach this problem?

Find mass in kg of spherical planet if:
-71.11% of surface is covered by oceans
- avg depth of oceans is 12.83 furlongs
-avg density of water is 1.030 g/mL
-avg radius of planet is 4,895 miles
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have an average density for the non-water part of the planet? Or are you just looking for the mass of water on the spherical planet?

Edit: I see now in the title that you are just looking for the water.

Step 1, draw a picture.
Step 2, find the total volume of the sphere from avg. depth to avg. radius.
Step 3, multiply total volume by % surface that is water.
Step 4, multiply that volume by density to find mass.
 
Step 1.5: use consistent units in your calculations. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes RUber
SteamKing said:
Step 1.5: use consistent units in your calculations. :wink:
When in doubt, google's unit conversion tool is very helpful.
Example:
"convert furlongs to km" returns.
1 furlong = 0.201168 kilometers.
 
I got 3.518x10^16 kg. Does that sound reasonable?

Edit: Disregard that I may have found an error in my calculations
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top