Finding Length of Line Traced by f(x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alkatran
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Line
AI Thread Summary
To find the length of a line traced by a function f(x), the formula involves integrating the square root of one plus the square of the derivative, expressed as L = ∫_a^b √(1 + (f'(x))^2) dx. For polynomials of degree three or higher, this integral cannot be computed exactly, leading to the need for numerical methods and approximations. The discussion highlights the use of small linear approximations, where the length can be estimated by summing segments defined by Δx and Δy. As the number of segments increases, the approximation improves, converging to the integral definition of curve length. Ultimately, evaluating these lengths often requires numerical techniques due to the complexity introduced by the square root.
Alkatran
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
959
Reaction score
0
Are there any formulas for finding the length of the line traced out by some function f()?

IE: If f(x) = cx + b where c and b are constants
The length from 0 to x is:
l(x) = sqr(x^2 + (cx)^2)

But I don't know what to do for any polynomial above a line.
I can make a summation for it, but don't know how to simplify.

l(x) = lim[t->infinity](sum[n = 0 to t](sqr( 1/x^2 + (f(x*n/t)-f(x*(n+1)/t)))^2)))

Basically the sum of arbitrarily small linear approximations.


I figure the length of sin() and cos() are related to pi somehow...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
As written in my calculus textbook:

Theorem: Let f be afunction s.t. f ' is continuous on [a,b]. The length L of the curve joining the points R(a,f(a)) and S(b,f(b)) is given by

L=\int_a^b\sqrt{1+(f '(x))^2}dx
 
For a polynomial y=y(x) of degree larger or equal to three,the integral cannot be computed exactly.U'd be dealing with so-called "LEGENDRE ELLIPTIC INTEGRALS".
Only numerical methids would work.

Daniel.
 
Alkatran said:
Basically the sum of arbitrarily small linear approximations.
This is exactly how the length is defined if you take the limiting process.
I'll use slightly different notation then you did.

A small line segment of width \Delta x can be approximated by:
\sqrt{(\Delta x)^2+(\Delta y)}

by cutting up the interval [a,b] into n subintervals of width \Delta x, you can approximate the length by:

L \approx \sum_{i=1}^n\sqrt{(\Delta x_i)^2+(\Delta y_i)}=\sum_{i=1}^n\sqrt{1+(\frac{\Delta y_i}{\Delta x_i})^2}\Delta x_i

The approximation gets better of n gets larger.
The length of the curve is defined by:

L=\lim_{n \to \infty}\sum_{i=1}^n\sqrt{1+(\frac{\Delta y_i}{\Delta x_i})^2}\Delta x_i=\int_a^b \sqrt{1+y'(x)^2}dx

The square root often makes it very difficult or impossible to evaluate explicitly. We'll have to resort to approximating the length. With Simpson's rule for example.
 
Last edited:
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
579
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top