Finding load current using kirchoffs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andrew187
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Load
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Kirchhoff's laws to calculate load current in a circuit as part of an assignment. Participants examine the correctness of the calculations and algebra involved in the problem-solving process.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant shares their calculations using Kirchhoff's law and requests feedback on their correctness.
  • Several participants express initial agreement with the calculations, stating they look correct.
  • Another participant identifies multiple algebraic errors in the calculations, pointing out issues with unit consistency and incorrect equations.
  • Concerns are raised about the participant's understanding of algebra and unit handling, suggesting that these errors could lead to incorrect results.
  • A participant mentions having obtained a different result using Norton's theorem, indicating uncertainty about the correctness of the Kirchhoff-based approach.
  • There is acknowledgment of the algebra errors and a suggestion to improve attention to detail in calculations.
  • Participants provide corrections to specific equations and emphasize the importance of consistent unit handling throughout the problem-solving process.
  • One participant expresses gratitude for the feedback and indicates they will attempt the calculations again.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

While some participants initially agree with the correctness of the calculations, significant disagreement arises regarding the algebraic steps and unit consistency. The discussion reflects multiple competing views on the accuracy of the calculations, and no consensus is reached on the final correctness of the approach.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the participant's algebraic skills and unit management, which are critical for correctly applying Kirchhoff's laws. Specific equations and their transformations are debated, indicating unresolved mathematical steps and potential misunderstandings.

Andrew187
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hi there attached is a task where i had to calculate the value of the load using kirchhoffs law I would be grateful if someone can check this to see if its correct, its part of an assignment question.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Looks okay to me.
 
Yup, looks right. Nice work.
 
You did get the correct final answer, but I wouldn't call it nice work.

Under the heading "Loop B E F C" you have a number of algebra errors.

Your next to last equation has inconsistent units, a problem inherited from above.

Furthermore, in the next to last equation, you didn't divide the 3V by 4Ω without which you can't get a numerical value of .851

Don't turn this paper in.
 
So where have I gone wrong? It really is bugging me because I know my answer is right as I have done this circuit with nortons theorum and it gave me 0.444a, but with this was a stab in the dark with kirchhoffs but the paper requires me to use kirchhoff I'm all over the place:(
 
The first equation you have after the heading "Loop B E F C" is:

2v = 6ΩI2 + 1ΩI1(I2-I1)

The I1 in red shouldn't be there. Then next you have:

2V = 1ΩI1 + 7ΩI2 but it should be:

2V = -1ΩI1 + 7ΩI2

Next you have :

3V = 4ΩI1 - 1ΩI2 which you brought down from Loop A B C E; it is correct.

But next you rewrote equation (2) introducing a typo. The coefficient of I1 should be -1Ω (although you had +1Ω; you didn't even copy what you had correctly, but it was wrong anyway. But, at the very least you should be able to copy it without introducing a typo). You have:


2V = -4ΩI1 + 7ΩI2

but it should be:

2V = -1ΩI1 + 7ΩI2

Then you copied equation 1 again:


3V = 4ΩI1 - 1ΩI2

Next, you multiplied your incorrect version of equation 2 by 4:

8V = -16ΩI1 + 28ΩI2

but it should actually be:

8V = -4ΩI1 + 28ΩI2

Apparently, what you did at the end was to add these two equations:

3V = 4ΩI1 - 1ΩI2

8V = -16ΩI1 + 28ΩI2

and got as a result:

11V = 27ΩI2

But if you had done the algebra correctly, you would have gotten:

11V = -12ΩI1 + 27ΩI2

which would have given you a wrong answer.

The two equations you should have added are:


3V = 4ΩI1 - 1ΩI2 This is the correct equation (1) from Loop A B C D

8V = -4ΩI1 + 28ΩI2 This is the correct equation (2)

Now, if you add these two equations, you get:

11V = 27ΩI2 which is correct. You somehow got this even though your algebra was incorrect.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Next, you aren't keeping track of your units properly.

Under the heading "Sub I2 into equation (1)", you have:

3V = 4ΩI1 - 1ΩI2 (0.407a)

which then becomes:

3V = 4ΩI1 - 0.407a

but the second term on the right hand side isn't amps; you got it by multiplying 1Ω times .407 amps which gives .407 volts, not .407 amps.

The units problem still exists in the next equation:

3V + 0.407a = 4ΩI1

It should be 3V + 0.407V = 4ΩI1

Then you would have:

I1 = 3V/4Ω + 0.407V/4Ω = 0.851a

I think you need to practice your algebra skills some more, and exercise greater care with your units.
 
Andrew187 said:
So where have I gone wrong? It really is bugging me because I know my answer is right as I have done this circuit with nortons theorum and it gave me 0.444a, but with this was a stab in the dark with kirchhoffs but the paper requires me to use kirchhoff I'm all over the place:(

The Electrician is correct. I paid more attention to your initial loop equations and the final expressions for the result values than to the mechanics of the math lying in between. Shame on me :redface:

Clean up your algebra as The Electrician suggests.
 
First of all let me thankyou guys for your help, You are right electrician my algebra is attrocious:( But I've had another go hopefully it is right this time thankyou one more time.
 

Attachments

Under the heading "Loop A B C D", you are not handling your units in a consistent way; you should have:

3v = 3ΩI1 + 1Ω(I1 - I2)
3v = 3ΩI1 + 1ΩI1 - 1ΩI2
3v = 4ΩI1 - 1ΩI2

and under the heading "Loop B E F C", the 5th and 6th equations down, you should have:

3v = 4ΩI1 -1ΩI2 You copied this wrong; the 4 is not negative.
8v = -4ΩI1 + 28ΩI2 You forgot to multiply the -1 by 4.

You've got to be more careful or you're going to have trouble come exam time!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
879
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K