Finding Maximum Range of a Projectile: Velocity and Formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter phoenix20_06
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convert Formula
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the maximum range of a projectile based on its velocity, specifically in the context of a baseball pitcher throwing a ball. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the units of velocity provided in the problem statement.

Discussion Character

  • Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between velocity and maximum range, questioning the meaning of the units "min/h" and suggesting that it may be a misprint. There is an attempt to formulate the problem mathematically using proportionality.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the unit confusion and exploring the mathematical relationships involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding how to set up the equations based on the proportionality of range to the square of velocity.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the correct interpretation of the velocity units, which may impact the clarity of the problem setup. The original poster's understanding of the relationship between velocity and range is also in question.

phoenix20_06
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello,

I have a language problem that affects my Math problem :-) I hope you can assist me with this.

The Maximum range of a projectile is directly proportional to the square of it's velocity. A baseball pitcher can throw a ball at 60 min/h, with a maximum range of 242ft. What would his maximum range be if he could throw the ball at 70 min/h.

I'm not what min/h means. isn't velocity is in m/s or ft/s?

I'm lost at this point.

I would think it's something like m = (v^2)x

but I'm not sure if it's even a right assumption.

thank you for any input

What would be the formula?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah, there is something wrong with the units as stated. AFAIK, "min" is short for minutes, and not much else. "h" can be short for hours, and there's 60 minutes in an hour, so 60 min/h may be a thing, but it sure isn't a velocity. As you say, velocity will have units of distance/time.

So that needs to be clarified at some point, but I think you can solve the problem without knowing what the actual units are for the velocity.

The problem says that the max range is proportional to the square of the velocity. So write that mathematically like this:

[tex]D = K V^2[/tex]

Where K is some proportionality constant. Then you can write two equations for the two different situations (different initial velocities give different max distances):

[tex]D_1 = K {V_1}^2[/tex]

[tex]D_2 = K {V_2}^2[/tex]

Put in the 60 <whatever units> and 242 ft. into the first equation, and put in what you know so far, the 70 <whatever units> into the 2nd equation. Now you want to solve for D2. Do you have some ideas on how you can do that?
 
Berkeman thank you for your reply.
I believe the solution would be:

242 = K60^2
x = K 70^2

so
x/242 = (70^2/60^2)
x = (4900/3600)* 242 = 398.38m

It was very helpful :-)
 
Good job. That min/h thing would have thrown me too! It's only because the units don't matter in this problem, that you were able to ignore the goofy units and solve the problem.
 
I would suspect that "min/h" is a misprint for "mi/h"- mile per hour. But as Berkeman explained, it doesn't affect your answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K