Finding multiple ways to calculate or find coefficient of friction (μ)

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding various methods to calculate the coefficient of friction (μ) using a wooden block and board in a physics lab. The initial approach involves using kinematic equations to determine forces acting on the block, including net force, applied force, and frictional forces. The teacher suggests that there are numerous methods to calculate μ, beyond the basic ones, and encourages exploring concepts like angles for additional techniques. Participants highlight the need for specific measurements, such as distance and velocity, to accurately determine kinetic friction. The conversation emphasizes the importance of being thorough and specific in experimental design to uncover more methods for calculating the coefficient of friction.
Janarth_M
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I will be conducting a physics lab tomorrow, where the goal of the lab is to find or calculate the coefficient of friction in as many ways as possible. I have a block of wood at my disposal, and a wooden board. A stopwatch is able to be used as well. We will probably be able to find the mass of the block of wood using a device to measure weight.


Homework Equations


My teacher has stated that using displacement (and probably V1, V2, delta T, acceleration), it is possible to find Fnet. If this were true, since we know m(a) = Fnet, and we know we could find a way to get Fa (applied force), one would theoretically be able to find Ffriction, since Fnet = Fa + (- Ffriction).

There are basic kinematic formulas available, such as: (solving for D, V1, V2, delta T, Aav, Vav, etc).


The Attempt at a Solution


Thinking about this, at first one would conceive the possible solutions that would yield a displacement and time (and probably V1 and V2). From this, we could find the forces that were being acted upon in the situation on the wooden block, including Fnet, Fa, Fg, and Fn. If we have these, we would also be able to find Fk (the force of kinetic friction), and Fs (the force of static friction). Then we could find the mu's by using the formulas Fk = Mu(k)FN and Fs = Mu(s)FN.

That's what I thought at first, anyway. However, my teacher states that there are many methods to calculate or find mu (the coefficient of friction). In fact, he had stated that 10 methods wasn't even that great. I've thought about a couple of methods to find kinematic values such as velocities and displacements, using them to find forces being acted upon on the block, and then finding the force of friction and then finally the coefficient of friction.

However, is there something I'm missing? Does anyone know many methods to find the coefficient of friction? Perhaps there's one sort of concept or idea that I can't think of that's stopping me from finding new methods, but besides the basic one(s) I'm not quite sure.

You don't have to give out hundreds of methods, but it would be appreciated if there's some sort of idea involving perhaps angles, or something else, that would give me more ways of calculating or finding mu of friction.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start with static friction. How will you measure that coefficient?

For kinetic, you will need more equipment, such as way to measure distance. If exerting a force, where is that coming from? Will you need to measure a velocity?
You will only need to measure mass if a second mass is involved.

Your musings do not really constitute an attempt. Try to be more specific.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K