Finding Number of Terms in {ak} Sequence - Help Needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter murshid_islam
  • Start date Start date
murshid_islam
Messages
468
Reaction score
21
this is the problem:
let {ak} be a sequence of real numbers. and the sequence is defined as

a_0 = 2006

a_{n} = \log_{2}a_{n-1}

now i have to find out the number of terms in the sequence.

this is what i have done:
i see that a5 is negative. so we can't find out a6 or any other subsequent terms. so the number of terms is 6 (a0 upto a5).

but how can i find out the number of terms without calculating the terms upto a5? is there a way to do it?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If a_{n} = \log_{2}a_{n-1} is true, then 2^{a_n} = a_{n-1)

So this tells us 2^{2^{2...^{2^{a_n}}}} = a_0 So find how many times you can put two to itself before it goes past 2006.

I think that works
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top