MHB Finding Orbit Type with Energy Equation

AI Thread Summary
To determine the type of orbit using the energy equation, the formula E = v²/2 - μ/r is applied, where μ = G(m1 + m2). The values for position and velocity vectors are provided, allowing the calculation of the specific energy E. It is established that E = 0 indicates a parabolic orbit, E > 0 indicates a hyperbolic orbit, and E < 0 indicates an elliptical orbit, with circular orbits occurring when v²r = μ. A confusion arose regarding the inclusion of the mass term in the kinetic energy component and the derivation of μ. Clarification on μ allowed for successful application of the energy equation to find the orbit type.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
How does one use the energy equation to determine the type of orbit?
$$
E = \frac{v^2}{2} - \frac{\mu}{r}
$$
where $\mu = G(m_1+m_2)$ and
$$
\mathbf{r} = \begin{pmatrix}
-4069.503\\
2861.786\\
4483.608
\end{pmatrix}\text{km},\quad
\mathbf{v} = \begin{pmatrix}
-5.114\\
-5.691\\
-1.000
\end{pmatrix}\text{km/sec}
$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
As I understand it, $E=0$ is parabolic, $E>0$ is hyperbolic, and $E<0$ is elliptic. If $v^{2}r=\mu$, then it's circular.
 
Ackbach said:
As I understand it, $E=0$ is parabolic, $E>0$ is hyperbolic, and $E<0$ is elliptic. If $v^{2}r=\mu$, then it's circular.

My issue was I didn't have a mu term.
 
dwsmith said:
How does one use the energy equation to determine the type of orbit?
$$
E = \frac{v^2}{2} - \frac{\mu}{r}
$$
where $\mu = G(m_1+m_2)$ and
$$
\mathbf{r} = \begin{pmatrix}
-4069.503\\
2861.786\\
4483.608
\end{pmatrix}\text{km},\quad
\mathbf{v} = \begin{pmatrix}
-5.114\\
-5.691\\
-1.000
\end{pmatrix}\text{km/sec}
$$
I'm confused about two things:
1. You are missing an "m" from the kinetic energy term.

2. You defined \mu in your original post. Is this a result you are supposed to derive perhaps?

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
I'm confused about two things:
1. You are missing an "m" from the kinetic energy term.

2. You defined \mu in your original post. Is this a result you are supposed to derive perhaps?

-Dan

Later on I was told what mu is for this problem so I was able to do it.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top