MHB Finding Orbit Type with Energy Equation

Click For Summary
To determine the type of orbit using the energy equation, the formula E = v²/2 - μ/r is applied, where μ = G(m1 + m2). The values for position and velocity vectors are provided, allowing the calculation of the specific energy E. It is established that E = 0 indicates a parabolic orbit, E > 0 indicates a hyperbolic orbit, and E < 0 indicates an elliptical orbit, with circular orbits occurring when v²r = μ. A confusion arose regarding the inclusion of the mass term in the kinetic energy component and the derivation of μ. Clarification on μ allowed for successful application of the energy equation to find the orbit type.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
How does one use the energy equation to determine the type of orbit?
$$
E = \frac{v^2}{2} - \frac{\mu}{r}
$$
where $\mu = G(m_1+m_2)$ and
$$
\mathbf{r} = \begin{pmatrix}
-4069.503\\
2861.786\\
4483.608
\end{pmatrix}\text{km},\quad
\mathbf{v} = \begin{pmatrix}
-5.114\\
-5.691\\
-1.000
\end{pmatrix}\text{km/sec}
$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
As I understand it, $E=0$ is parabolic, $E>0$ is hyperbolic, and $E<0$ is elliptic. If $v^{2}r=\mu$, then it's circular.
 
Ackbach said:
As I understand it, $E=0$ is parabolic, $E>0$ is hyperbolic, and $E<0$ is elliptic. If $v^{2}r=\mu$, then it's circular.

My issue was I didn't have a mu term.
 
dwsmith said:
How does one use the energy equation to determine the type of orbit?
$$
E = \frac{v^2}{2} - \frac{\mu}{r}
$$
where $\mu = G(m_1+m_2)$ and
$$
\mathbf{r} = \begin{pmatrix}
-4069.503\\
2861.786\\
4483.608
\end{pmatrix}\text{km},\quad
\mathbf{v} = \begin{pmatrix}
-5.114\\
-5.691\\
-1.000
\end{pmatrix}\text{km/sec}
$$
I'm confused about two things:
1. You are missing an "m" from the kinetic energy term.

2. You defined \mu in your original post. Is this a result you are supposed to derive perhaps?

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
I'm confused about two things:
1. You are missing an "m" from the kinetic energy term.

2. You defined \mu in your original post. Is this a result you are supposed to derive perhaps?

-Dan

Later on I was told what mu is for this problem so I was able to do it.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
804
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
3K