Finding point-normal equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Computnik
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the point-normal equation for a line defined by two vectors in R2. The line is expressed as L = u1 + k*u2, where u1 and u2 are 2×1 vectors. Participants clarify that the point-normal equation can be derived by eliminating the parameter k from the equations for x and y. The key step involves setting the expressions for k equal and rearranging them to the standard form of the point-normal equation. The final equation is derived as d2(x - a) - d1(y - b) = 0, confirming that the approach is valid and straightforward.
Computnik
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Say that I have a problem along the lines of: Find the point-normal equation for the line L.

L=u1+k*u2, where k is ℝ.

And then I'm given u1 and u2, which both are 2×1 vectors.

Then L will also be a 2×1 vector (which consists of a11 and a21), which I guess is ok (since it gives the two coordinats in R2).

However the point-normal equation is in the form of (for some constants a and b and some points x0 and y0 on the line L):

a(x-x0)+b(y-0)=0.

So here comes my question: In the vector L: Are a11 or a21 x?


Homework Equations


-

The Attempt at a Solution


See above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Computnik said:

Homework Statement


Say that I have a problem along the lines of: Find the point-normal equation for the line L.

L=u1+k*u2, where k is ℝ.

And then I'm given u1 and u2, which both are 2×1 vectors.

Then L will also be a 2×1 vector (which consists of a11 and a21), which I guess is ok (since it gives the two coordinats in R2).

However the point-normal equation is in the form of (for some constants a and b and some points x0 and y0 on the line L):

a(x-x0)+b(y-0)=0.

So here comes my question: In the vector L: Are a11 or a21 x?


Homework Equations


-


The Attempt at a Solution


See above.

Let ##u_1=\langle a, b\rangle## and ##u_2=\langle d_1,d_2\rangle##. Then your line is ##\langle x,y\rangle = \langle a, b\rangle + k\langle d_1,d_2\rangle##. Eliminate the ##k## between the ##x## and ##y## equations and put it in your required form. Note that ##(a,b)## is a point on the line.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
LCKurtz said:
Let ##u_1=\langle a, b\rangle## and ##u_2=\langle d_1,d_2\rangle##. Then your line is ##\langle x,y\rangle = \langle a, b\rangle + k\langle d_1,d_2\rangle##. Eliminate the ##k## between the ##x## and ##y## equations and put it in your required form. Note that ##(a,b)## is a point on the line.
Two questions:

1. (Perhaps a dumb question) Is ##\langle x,y\rangle## another way of writing a 2×1 matrix where x=a11 and y=a21? (I'm really new to linear algebra...)

2. If I'm correct about question 1, then I still don't see how I can "translate" ##\langle x,y\rangle = \langle a, b\rangle + k\langle d_1,d_2\rangle## to the form of

a(x-x0)+b(y-y0)=0

(That was what my original question was all about.)

Thanks for the help LCKurtz!
 
Computnik said:
Two questions:

1. (Perhaps a dumb question) Is ##\langle x,y\rangle## another way of writing a 2×1 matrix where x=a11 and y=a21? (I'm really new to linear algebra...)

It does't matter whether you use a 2x1 or 1x2 matrix in this problem. You have two entries either way.

2. If I'm correct about question 1, then I still don't see how I can "translate" ##\langle x,y\rangle = \langle a, b\rangle + k\langle d_1,d_2\rangle## to the form of

a(x-x0)+b(y-y0)=0

(That was what my original question was all about.)

Thanks for the help LCKurtz!

Do what I suggested. Write the equations for ##x## and ##y## from the given matrix equation and eliminate the ##k## parameter. Try it.
 
LCKurtz said:
It does't matter whether you use a 2x1 or 1x2 matrix in this problem. You have two entries either way.
Do what I suggested. Write the equations for ##x## and ##y## from the given matrix equation and eliminate the ##k## parameter. Try it.
I'm not sure what you mean with "eliminate the ##k## parameter".

But I guess this is a start?

##x=a+kd_1##

and

##y=b+kd_2##

now let me put ##x## and ##y## into the "form" of the point-normal equation. Which I will call:

##p(x-x_0)+q(y-y_0)=0##, where ##p## and ##q## are constants.

We know that ##x_0=a## and ##y_0=b## are solutions because ##k## could be ##0##.

so

##p((a+kd_1)-a)+q((b+kd_2)-b)=0##

##p(kd_1)+q(kd_2)=0##

##k(pd_1+qd_2)=0##

##pd_1+qd_2=0##

where ##(p,d)## is the normal to ##(x,y)##. But how do you get ##(p,d)##?

Does the calculations look ok LCKurtz?
 
Last edited:
Not quite. From ##x=a+kd_1,~y=b+kd_2## you eliminate ##k##. Solve each equation for ##k## and set them equal:$$
k = \frac {x-a}{d_1} = \frac {y-b}{d_2}$$Put that last equation in the form$$
(?)(x-a) + (??)(y-b) = 0$$and you will have your form.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I'm a bit lost. :/ Any more tips?
 
LCKurtz said:
Not quite. From ##x=a+kd_1,~y=b+kd_2## you eliminate ##k##. Solve each equation for ##k## and set them equal:$$
k = \frac {x-a}{d_1} = \frac {y-b}{d_2}$$Put that last equation in the form$$
(?)(x-a) + (??)(y-b) = 0$$and you will have your form.
I know that the ##(?)## ##(??)## are the normal to the line ##\langle x,y\rangle = \langle a, b\rangle + k\langle d_1,d_2\rangle##. However what I don't know is how you should obtain the normal for that line...
 
You say you are taking linear algebra but the problems you are having are all much more basic algebra matters.

\frac{x-a}{d_1}= \frac{y- b}{d_2}

An obvious thing to do is to multiply both sides by d_1d_2 to get rid of the fractions:
d_2(x- a)= d_1(y- b)
d_2(x- a)- d_1(y- b)= 0
 
  • #10
HallsofIvy said:
You say you are taking linear algebra but the problems you are having are all much more basic algebra matters.

\frac{x-a}{d_1}= \frac{y- b}{d_2}

An obvious thing to do is to multiply both sides by d_1d_2 to get rid of the fractions:
d_2(x- a)= d_1(y- b)
d_2(x- a)- d_1(y- b)= 0
I feel like such an idiot now, that was my initial thought but I dismissed it because it felt like it was too easy to be the right answer. :redface:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
6K