Finding Real and Imaginary Parts of Complex Numbers

AI Thread Summary
To find the real and imaginary parts of the complex number 12/(12+3i), one should multiply both the numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate (12-3i). This method eliminates the imaginary component from the denominator, allowing for a straightforward separation of the real and imaginary parts. The initial assumption that the real part is 1 and the imaginary part is 4 is incorrect. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the complex conjugate in calculations involving complex numbers. Properly applying this technique will yield the correct results in programming contexts like ANSI C.
magda3227
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
If I were given a complex number, such as

12/(12+3i)

in order to find the real and imaginary parts of the number, I assume that I cannot just reduce the fraction and say the real part is 1 and the imaginary part is 4. I can almost guarantee that this will not calculate the correct answer.

So how would I find the real and imaginary parts of this number?

I'm sorry to ask such a stupid question, but I am rewriting MatLab code into ANSI C and need to separate such numbers into their real and imaginary parts.

Thank you in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Multiply the top and bottom of the complex conjugate (12-3i). This clears the denominator of the imaginary component.
 
Thank you.

Sadly, I didn't think of doing that.
 
magda3227 said:
Thank you.

Sadly, I didn't think of doing that.

Why sadly?

Next time, you'll manage on your own. :smile:
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top