Finding required resistor to reduce voltage

  • Thread starter Thread starter deus_ex_86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistor Voltage
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing a dummy indicator light for a car using a #47 incandescent lamp rated at 6.3V and 150 mA, while the car's voltage is 13.5V. The calculated resistor values needed to reduce the voltage across the bulb are approximately 48Ω, with the nearest available 10% resistor being 47Ω. Using the 47Ω resistor results in about 6.37V across the bulb, which is acceptable since light bulbs are not very sensitive to slight voltage variations. The 56Ω resistor, while reducing current to 137.76 mA and dimming the bulb slightly, is also a viable option, but the 47Ω resistor is preferred for optimal brightness. Overall, the 47Ω resistor is recommended for this application, balancing performance and safety.
deus_ex_86
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Your task is to design a "dummy" indicator light for your car. The cheapest bulb available is a #47 incandescent lamp rated at 6.3V for 150 mA. The problem is, your car produces 13.5 V when it's on. Choose the nearest 10% resistor that will reduce the voltage across the bulb to 6.3V.


Homework Equations


V = IR


The Attempt at a Solution



I modeled the bulb as a resistor:

6.3 V = .150 A * R
Which gives R = 42 \Omega.

From there, I plugged this value into a new circuit with a 13.5 V source instead of a 6.3 V source, and added the unknown resistor to the equation:

13.5 V = .150 A * R + 6.3 V
7.2 V = .150 A * R
R = 48 \Omega.

The nearest 10% resistor value is 47 \Omega, but this wouldn't reduce the voltage across the bulb to 6.3 V. The next closest 10% resistor is 56 \Omega. It just seems that this value is too high ... Did I follow this process correctly? What would you choose?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
48-ohms look right. What are you getting for the new bulb voltage (with the 47-ohm R)?
 
48 ohms is the theoretical value, but I have to choose a 10% resistor to use. When I use the 47 ohm resistor, I end up with 6.37 V across the bulb.
 
Close enough!

[edit: To the letter of the question the solution does not exist. To the intent of the question, 47-ohms is a good answer, if you stipulate your voltage deviation, you should be fine.]
 
With a 47Ω resistor, the bulb will have approximately 6.37 volts across it. Light bulbs are not very picky, so this will work fine.

With the 56Ω resistor, the bulb will only have about 5.79 volts across it. Still, a workable voltage, but it's the current that we're really concerned with...

The 47Ω resistor will limit the current through the bulb to about 151.69 mA which is just over the design rating. The bulb will burn slightly brighter (although probably not noticeably).

The 56Ω resistor will limit the current down to about 137.76 mA and the bulb will burn slightly dimmer. You're only looking at about an 8% loss of current though, so either will work.

I'd use the 47Ω resistor.
 
zgozvrm said:
With a 47Ω resistor, the bulb will have approximately 6.37 volts across it. Light bulbs are not very picky, so this will work fine.

With the 56Ω resistor, the bulb will only have about 5.79 volts across it. Still, a workable voltage, but it's the current that we're really concerned with...

The 47Ω resistor will limit the current through the bulb to about 151.69 mA which is just over the design rating. The bulb will burn slightly brighter (although probably not noticeably).

The 56Ω resistor will limit the current down to about 137.76 mA and the bulb will burn slightly dimmer. You're only looking at about an 8% loss of current though, so either will work.

I'd use the 47Ω resistor.

Thanks, so would my TA, as I got a 100% on the assignment. :)
 
With ±10% resistors there could be a resistor that is 42.3Ω and car battery voltage can spike into the 14.0 volt range. That would cause 166 ma to flow through the bulb or about 10.7% more. Since power is I²R, there can be an extra 23% power dissipated through the bulb which will shorten its life.

IMO the design would have had some breathing room built in if you went with the 56Ω bulb.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Back
Top