Finding Resultant Force using Component Method

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the resultant force using the component method for a force table lab involving four forces. The user successfully converted the masses into Newtons and expressed the first three forces in unit vector notation but is confused about the fourth force and the next steps. Clarifications indicate that the resultant force should be calculated by summing the x and y components of the first three forces, leading to a resultant vector of R=(-1.48)i+(2.61)j with a magnitude of 2.99 N. The direction of the resultant can be determined from its components, and it's noted that the fourth force likely serves to balance the setup, opposing the resultant of the first three forces. Understanding the calculations and the relationship between the forces is essential for completing the lab assignment.
jeff12
Messages
40
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



This is the force table lab that we are doing.

F _1 = 300g @ 30^o
F _2 = 450g @ 110^o
F _3 = 400g @ 230^o
F _4 = 270g @ 298^o

Finding resultant force using Component Method

1. Express each force F1, F2, and F3 in unit vector notation. Take the origin to be at the center of the force table (at pivot point) with the +x axis along 0^o and +y-axis along 90^o.

2. Use the component method to obtain the resultant force vector Fcomp in unit vector notation. Calculate the magnitude and direction.

Homework Equations


sinθ=opp/hyp
cosθ=adj/hyp
F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



His directions are kind of confusing to me.
For the step 1 I found:

I converted the mass into kg and then found the force.

F _1 = 2.94N
F _2 = -4.41N
F _3 = -3.92N

Then I express each force into unit vector notation.

F _1 = 2.94cos30i +2.94sin30j
F _2 = -4.41cos70i +4.41sin70j
F _3 = -3.92cos50i -3.92sin50j

Did I do this part right? Please check it for me.

I don't know where to start for step 2. Do I find F4?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jeff12 said:

Homework Statement



This is the force table lab that we are doing.

F _1 = 300g @ 30^o
F _2 = 450g @ 110^o
F _3 = 400g @ 230^o
F _4 = 270g @ 298^o

Finding resultant force using Component Method

1. Express each force F1, F2, and F3 in unit vector notation. Take the origin to be at the center of the force table (at pivot point) with the +x axis along 0^o and +y-axis along 90^o.

2. Use the component method to obtain the resultant force vector Fcomp in unit vector notation. Calculate the magnitude and direction.

Homework Equations


sinθ=opp/hyp
cosθ=adj/hyp
F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



His directions are kind of confusing to me.
For the step 1 I found:

I converted the mass into kg and then found the force.

F _1 = 2.94N
F _2 = -4.41N
F _3 = -3.92N
You should leave the signs off of the force magnitudes. Force magnitudes are always positive (absolute) values. It's the information from the angles where you form the components that will turn them into vectors with direction.
Then I express each force into unit vector notation.

F _1 = 2.94cos30i +2.94sin30j
F _2 = -4.41cos70i +4.41sin70j
F _3 = -3.92cos50i -3.92sin50j
Okay, I see you've sorted out how to use the trig functions with the given angles. Well done. At this point you should reduce the vectors to purely numerical component values. That is, evaluate each component, getting rid of the trig.
I don't know where to start for step 2. Do I find F4?
The instructions don't mention F4 at this point, so I'd just combine F1,F2, and F3 into a resultant. Do you no how to add vectors in unit vector form?
 
gneill said:
The instructions don't mention F4 at this point, so I'd just combine F1,F2, and F3 into a resultant. Do you no how to add vectors in unit vector form?

Is the formula:
R=A+B+C which would be R=(F1x+F1y)i+(F2x+F2y)j+(F3x+F3y)k?
 
jeff12 said:
Is the formula:
R=A+B+C which would be R=(F1x+F1y)i+(F2x+F2y)j+(F3x+F3y)k?
No, you only add like with like. That is, sum all the x-components to yield the net x component, sum all the y-components to yield the net y-component,...
 
Okay,
R=(-1.48)i+(2.61)j
Magnitude:
R=2.99
but what is the direction? Is that right?

I just want to clarify the R that we found is considered the F4 but found mathematically right? Because in the lab we were given F1, F2, ,F3 and we had to find F4 using the weights.
 
jeff12 said:
Okay,
R=(-1.48)i+(2.61)j
Magnitude:
R=2.99
but what is the direction? Is that right?
Looks okay. The direction is encoded in the components. Just sketch the resultant using the components and you'll see the direction. You can use these rectangular components to work out the magnitude and the angle if you want the polar version of the vector. Oh, always include units on results! That should be R=[(-1.48)i+(2.61)j] N, and |R| = 2.99 N.
I just want to clarify the R that we found is considered the F4 but found mathematically right?
I don't know, I wasn't in your lab :smile: But it seems a likely scenario that some fourth force was employed to balance the force table setup. Did you have to play with a fourth force to try to find an equilibrium? If so, in order to balance the resultant of the forces F1 through F3 you'd have to apply a force of the same magnitude as the resultant but in the opposite direction (i.e. oppose it equally).
 
  • Like
Likes jeff12
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
993
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K