I Finding ##S_x## eigenstate using experiments

Kashmir
Messages
466
Reaction score
74
Quantum mechanics, McIntyre, pg 62
IMG_20220426_181555.JPG

For above spin ##1## Stern Gerlach experiment a set of results is
"##
\begin{array}{c}
\mathcal{P}_{1 x}=\left.\left.\right|_{x}\langle 1 \mid 1\rangle\right|^{2}=\frac{1}{4} \\
\mathcal{P}_{0 x}=\left.\left.\right|_{x}\langle 0 \mid 1\rangle\right|^{2}=\frac{1}{2} \\
\mathcal{P}_{-1 x}=\left.\right|_{x}\left(-\left.1|1\rangle\right|^{2}=\frac{1}{4},\right.
\end{array}
##
as illustrated in Fig. 2.12. These experimental results can be used to determine the ##S_{x}## eigenstates in terms of the ##S_{z}## basis
##
\begin{array}{l}
|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle+\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle \\
|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle \\
|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle+\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle
\end{array}
##"To find the ##S_{x}## eigenstates in terms of the ##S_{z}## basis I need two more similar experiments in which the input to Sx analyzer are ##0,-1## spin particles respectively.

However I am getting a sign ambiguity while using the experimental results.

Below are two expressions which both are in line with the experiments:

* ##|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle+\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle##
##|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle##
##|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle+\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle ##

* ##|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle##
##|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle##
##|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle ##How do we resolve this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kashmir said:
* ##|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle##
##|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle##
##|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle ##
These states are not orthogonal.

Note that there is also some convention coming in. It is possible to find other linear combinations that satisfy the experiment, but a choice is made to recover a right-handed system of coordinates. It is also conventional to take spin along x to have real coefficients in the Sz basis.
 
  • Like
Likes Kashmir, Doc Al and PeroK
DrClaude said:
These states are not orthogonal.

Note that there is also some convention coming in. It is possible to find other linear combinations that satisfy the experiment, but a choice is made to recover a right-handed system of coordinates. It is also conventional to take spin along x to have real coefficients in the Sz basis.
Here are another orthogonal vectors ##|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle##

##|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle##

##|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle ##

So the other conventions as you mentioned are used to pick out a convenient set of orthogonal expressions ?
 
DrClaude said:
but a choice is made to recover a right-handed system of coordinates
Can you also please explain this?
 
Kashmir said:
Here are another orthogonal vectors ##|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle##

##|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle##

##|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle ##
Yes, this would be a possibility.

Kashmir said:
Can you also please explain this?
You want, for instance, that a rotation by ##\pi/2## around the y-axis will transform ##\ket{1}_x## into ##\ket{1}_z##.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top