Finding Solutions with a Replacement Set: x + 3 > 8

  • Thread starter Thread starter xowe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
xowe
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey, I'm new and trying to study for school which is starting again soon. I'm not very math smart, and need some help. How would I work out this problem? Thanks...xowe

Find the solution set for x + 3 > 8 if the replacement set is {0, 2, 5, 6, 10}.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Since you are given a finite "replacement set" (i.e. possible values for x), the simplest way to do this is just try each value and see what happens:

If x= 0, then x+3= 0+3= 3. No, that's not larger than 8.
If x= 2, then x+3= 2+3= 5. No, that's not larger than 8.
If x= 5, then x+3= 5+3= 8. No, that's not LARGER than 8.
If x= 6, then x+3= 6+3= 9. Yes! That's larger than 8
If x= 10, then x+ 3= 10+3= 13. Yes! That's larger than 13.
The solution set is {6, 10}.

Another way to do this is to solve the inequality generally:
x+ 3> 8- subtract 3 from both sides: x> 5. The only members of the replacement set that are larger than 5 are 6 and 10: the solution set is {6, 10}.
 
If x= 10, then x+ 3= 10+3= 13. Yes! That's larger than 13.

I meant, of course, "larger than 8".
 
Ah, ha! Thank you, now I get it...xowe
 
Its been 8 years since this was posted but it still helped me with my 8th grade math THANK YOU
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top