Finding Solutions with a Replacement Set: x + 3 > 8

  • Thread starter Thread starter xowe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
AI Thread Summary
To solve the inequality x + 3 > 8 using the replacement set {0, 2, 5, 6, 10}, each value is tested. Values 0, 2, and 5 do not satisfy the inequality, while 6 and 10 do. Alternatively, solving the inequality generally shows that x must be greater than 5, confirming that the solution set is {6, 10}. This method effectively demonstrates how to approach similar problems. The discussion highlights both testing values and algebraic manipulation as valid strategies for solving inequalities.
xowe
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey, I'm new and trying to study for school which is starting again soon. I'm not very math smart, and need some help. How would I work out this problem? Thanks...xowe

Find the solution set for x + 3 > 8 if the replacement set is {0, 2, 5, 6, 10}.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Since you are given a finite "replacement set" (i.e. possible values for x), the simplest way to do this is just try each value and see what happens:

If x= 0, then x+3= 0+3= 3. No, that's not larger than 8.
If x= 2, then x+3= 2+3= 5. No, that's not larger than 8.
If x= 5, then x+3= 5+3= 8. No, that's not LARGER than 8.
If x= 6, then x+3= 6+3= 9. Yes! That's larger than 8
If x= 10, then x+ 3= 10+3= 13. Yes! That's larger than 13.
The solution set is {6, 10}.

Another way to do this is to solve the inequality generally:
x+ 3> 8- subtract 3 from both sides: x> 5. The only members of the replacement set that are larger than 5 are 6 and 10: the solution set is {6, 10}.
 
If x= 10, then x+ 3= 10+3= 13. Yes! That's larger than 13.

I meant, of course, "larger than 8".
 
Ah, ha! Thank you, now I get it...xowe
 
Its been 8 years since this was posted but it still helped me with my 8th grade math THANK YOU
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top