Finding Spectrum of Hamiltonians

  • Thread starter Thread starter curtdbz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spectrum
curtdbz
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I wanted to know if there was a standard way of finding out the spectrum of a Hamiltionian given a specific H. For example, H = -\Delta - 10|x|^{3} + |x|^{4} or H = -\Delta -(1+|x|)^{-2}.

I don't need answers to the above, I just want to know if one can describe the spectrums of Hamiltinian's such as those, in an easy fashion. I'm looking at examples from the textbook and something as simple as the operator x or even momentum p have a fairly complicated derivation to show their spectrum is [0,\infty).

Does the variation principle come into play at all? Can anyone find examples on the web, like a ton of them, so that I can learn and get the hang of it? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as you are dealing with one-dimensional one-body problems, the simplest way of getting an impression of what is going on is probably to just code up a scheme to calculate the eigenvalues numerically on a fixed grid (with a finite-difference approach). In python with scipy or MATLAB this can be done in less than 100 lines of code.

Say, you have an finite x space of -5.0 to 5.0 in steps of h=0.01, denoted as x_i, then you can setup the (approximate) Hamiltonian as
<i|H|i> = V(x_i) + 2*z
<i|H|j> = -z | i is next to j
<i|H|j> = 0 | otherwise
where i,j denote grid points and z = 0.5 * h^2 and V(x_i) is the potential function at grid point x_i.
Then you can just use a dense matrix diagonalization routine to get the eigenvalues.

This is not exactly a mathematical proof, but it might give you some impression of the behavior of the system.
 
cgk said:
As long as you are dealing with one-dimensional one-body problems, the simplest way of getting an impression of what is going on is probably to just code up a scheme to calculate the eigenvalues numerically on a fixed grid (with a finite-difference approach). In python with scipy or MATLAB this can be done in less than 100 lines of code.

Say, you have an finite x space of -5.0 to 5.0 in steps of h=0.01, denoted as x_i, then you can setup the (approximate) Hamiltonian as
<i|H|i> = V(x_i) + 2*z
<i|H|j> = -z | i is next to j
<i|H|j> = 0 | otherwise
where i,j denote grid points and z = 0.5 * h^2 and V(x_i) is the potential function at grid point x_i.
Then you can just use a dense matrix diagonalization routine to get the eigenvalues.

This is not exactly a mathematical proof, but it might give you some impression of the behavior of the system.

That's great, thanks so much! However, I can't use programming for this. Since they might be potential test questions or exam questions, and we're just supposed to use a pen and paper only. So I'm looking for a more mathematical way of solving these problems, fairly rigorously. In the future I will for sure use your python method though! Thanks
 
My understanding of these questions is very superficial, so I may be wrong, but I think it is a safe bet that in general these problems are very hard. In your examples the potential depend only on |x| so it is invariant under rotations and it may be a good idea to use spherical coordinates. Also the whole space will decompose as a sum of irreducible representations of the rotation group and you can restrict to those subspaces and get ordinary differential equations, which i presume will still be hard. You can take a look at the case of the Coulomb potential, which should be in most books.
 
Finding the spectrum of a Hamiltonian amounts to completely solving the system, so in general it is not possible at all, analytically. For one dimensional problems this can often be reduced to considering the mathematical properties of some differential operator on a given interval, which is a fairly well studied (i.e. extremely hard) field.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top