Finding the Closest Match to a Theoretical Curve

stats_student
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, i have been tasked with matching the upper a theoretical curve (seen in the picture-blue) to the upper experimental part. So far in an attempt to do this i have tried changing a single parameter in the equation i used to generate the theoretical curve, so that the sum of the differences between each observed and theoretical value is minimized.

as an example - my calculations are as follows:

(O1-T1)^2 = x
(O2-T2)^2 = y

where O and T stand for observed and theoretical. I then have summed x & y and then in excel change my parameter in the equation until x+y is minimized.

the results i get are shown in the picture.

I'm just wondering if there is a better method at getting the upper part of my curve to match as closely as possible.
Also keep in mind I'm allowed to change any of the parameters in the equation i have used.

any advice would be greatly appreciated thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Pic.jpg
    Pic.jpg
    27 KB · Views: 398
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh also the equation i have used is also shown in the picture.
 
i was thinking maybe a method where i attach weights to each point so that the upper part of the curve is matched more closely? Does a formal procedure for that exist?
 
Or perhaps i could ignore the bottom part of my curve and do a least squares regression on the upper part only?
not really sure if I'm thinking about this the right way.
any input would be appreciated.

Cheers.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top