MHB Understanding Inequalities: Why is Option C the Correct Answer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter squexy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Option C is correct because it accurately reflects the relationship between positive and negative numbers. The discussion clarifies that in option B, the sign of the numbers affects the truth of the expression, making it invalid. By manipulating the inequality in option C, it shows that if x is positive and y is negative, the inequality holds true. Thus, the conclusion is that a positive number is always greater than a negative number, confirming that C is the correct answer. Understanding these inequalities is crucial for solving similar problems effectively.
squexy
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
View attachment 2918Why is the answer "C" and not "B"?
 

Attachments

  • asdhaiusd.jpg
    asdhaiusd.jpg
    6.4 KB · Views: 80
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In B, the magnitude of a number does not depend on its sign. Clearly, for B, if x is 2, and y is -6, the expression is not true.

C essentially boils down to this, if you add 5 to both sides:

$$\frac{x}{3} > \frac{y}{3}$$

Multiply both sides by 3:

$$x > y$$

If x is a positive number and y is a negative number (as stated by the question), this is always true! Since, well, a positive number is always greater than a negative number. (Wait) (Wondering)
Therefore, C is the right answer.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top