Finding the Eigenstate of S2 for a Spin 1 Particle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the eigenstate of S² for a spin 1 particle, specifically aiming to show that it equals 2ħ² using the matrix representations of Sx, Sy, and Sz. The participant initially attempted to square the matrices and sum them but encountered an incorrect result. Feedback highlighted the need to correctly include the radicals in the Sx and Sy matrices before performing the addition. This correction led to a realization of the mistake in the approach. The thread concludes with the participant acknowledging the guidance received.
Jammy453
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to show the Eigenstate of S2 is 2ħ^2 given the matrix representations for Sx, Sy and Sz for a spin 1 particle

Homework Equations



Sx = ħ/√2 *
\begin{pmatrix}
0 & 1 & 0 \\
1 & 0 & 1 \\
0 & 1 & 0
\end{pmatrix}

Sy = ħ/√2 *
\begin{pmatrix}
0 & -i & 0 \\
i & 0 & -i \\
0 & i & 0
\end{pmatrix}

Sz = ħ*
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & -1
\end{pmatrix}

(I'm sorry I don't know how to format matrixes on here...)

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried squaring all the matrices and adding them together but I just get

2 *
\begin{pmatrix}
3 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 4 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 3
\end{pmatrix}

which is not an identity matrix? What have I not understood?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Jammy453 said:
What have I not understood?
Your method is correct. Check your implementation of it. You should put the radicals back in the ##S_x## and ##S_y## matrices where they belong before you add them.
 
  • Like
Likes Jammy453
kuruman said:
Your method is correct. Check your implementation of it. You should put the radicals back in the ##S_x## and ##S_y## matrices where they belong before you add them.

I see where I went wrong now, thank you!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top