MHB Finding the Equation of a Function.

  • Thread starter Thread starter vivalajuicy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the equation of a function represented by the points (0, 2), (1, 4), (2, 10), and (3, 28). Participants suggest trying a cubic equation of the form ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d to derive coefficients a, b, c, and d. A recurrence relation is also proposed, where a_{n+1} = a_n + 2 * 3^{n-1} with a_0 = 2. Additionally, subtracting 1 from the function values may reveal a recognizable sequence. The goal remains to accurately represent the function mathematically.
vivalajuicy
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
The following points are part of a table of values for a function.
(0, 2), (1, 4), (2, 10), (3, 28)
Represent this function as:
a) equation
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Try a cubic of the form $ax^3+bx^2+cx+d$ substitute your values to solve for $a,b,c,d$ , what do you get?
 
Hello, vivalajuicy!

The following points are part of a table of values for a function:
. . (0,2), (1,4), (2,10), (3,28)
Represent this function as: (a) equation
I don't have the equation yet, but I have a recurrence.

. . a_{n+1} \;=\;a_n + 2\!\cdot\!3^{n-1},\;\;\;a_0 = 2
 
vivalajuicy said:
The following points are part of a table of values for a function.
(0, 2), (1, 4), (2, 10), (3, 28)
Represent this function as:
a) equation
The values of the function are 2, 4, 10, 28. If you subtract 1 from each of those, it may give you a sequence that looks familiar.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top