Finding the force in a simple harmonic lattice

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the force acting on ions in a simple harmonic lattice using the potential energy formula U = 0.5*K[(u(an) - u([n+1]a)]^2. The correct application of the chain rule and differentiation leads to the expression for force as Force = -K[2u(an) - u([n-1]a) - u([n+1]a)]. The participants clarify that the potential energy must be expressed in terms of displacements from equilibrium, and emphasize the importance of correctly applying derivatives to achieve the desired result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion and lattice dynamics
  • Familiarity with potential energy concepts in physics
  • Proficiency in calculus, specifically differentiation and the chain rule
  • Knowledge of discrete systems and their mathematical representation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of force in harmonic oscillators using potential energy functions
  • Learn about discrete systems in physics and their mathematical modeling
  • Explore advanced applications of the chain rule in physics problems
  • Investigate the implications of lattice dynamics in material science
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying solid-state physics, materials science, or anyone involved in the analysis of harmonic systems and lattice dynamics.

Fyj
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If there are a large number of ions oscillating in a straight line, we can pick the nth one oscillating about its equilibrium a*n. The potential of the entire lattice is then U = 0.5*K[u(an)-u([n+1]a)]^2 - summed over all n. How do I use Force = -dU/du(an) to derive that Force = -K[2u(an)-u([n-1]a)-u([n+1]a)? Where K is some constant.

Homework Equations


The chain rule is f'(g(x))= df/dg * dg/dx

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried using the chain rule. Then if g = [u(an)-u([n+1]a)], then dU/dg = k*[u(an)-u([n+1]a)]. dg/du(an) can't be done analytically, however because we have a set of discrete points, dg = [(u(an) - (u[n-1]a) - (u[n+1]a)-u(an))].

I get dU/du(an) = K*[u(an)-u([n+1]a)]*[2u(an)-u([n-1]a)-u([n+1]a)]/du(an).
I am guessing I could write that du = [u([n+1]a)-u(an)] to get
dU/du(an) = -K*[2u(an)-u([n-1]a)]u([n+1]a)], but there's a minus sign that I can't get rid of.

Am I going about this all wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To make the formulae simpler, denote the displacement from equilibrium of the n-th particle (that one which equilibrium position is at na) by un.
The potential energy of the whole lattice is ##U=0.5K \sum {(u_{n+1}-u_n)^2}##. Writing it out, un appears in two terms:

U = ... K/2 [( un-un-1)2 + ( un+1-un)2 ]...

The force on the n-th particle is the negative gradient with respect to un, the displacement of the n-th particle. You get non-zero derivative from the terms above only.
Your derivation was wrong. What is the derivative of (x-y)2 with respect to x? With respect to y?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K