Finding the lift force on an airplane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the lift force on a 2598 kg airplane diving at a 10-degree angle. Participants clarify that the lift force acts perpendicular to the plane's velocity and must balance the gravitational force and any opposing forces like air resistance. Through a series of calculations, one user arrives at a lift force of 25585 N, while another initially calculates a different value of 19425 N, later acknowledging the correct answer. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding force vectors and their components in physics. Overall, the collaborative effort leads to a clearer understanding of the lift force dynamics in a diving airplane scenario.
Ripe
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 2598kg airplane is diving (at constant velocity) making an angle of 10 degrees to the horizontal. Find the lift force on the plane assuming that it is normal to the velocity?

I think my main problem is the fact that I'm having a bit trouble with understanding the terminology.

2. The attempt at a solution

Since it says that the plane makes an angle of 10 degrees to the horizontal whilst diving, I interpreted it as the angle is -10 degrees (i.e. south-east direction). Thus, the lift force would have an angle of 80 degrees.

The plane is diving at constant velocity, meaning the net force is 0. I tried different methods, but I couldn't come up with the right answer..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does your free body diagram look like? Always a good place to start.
 
Pretty much as described under "attempt at a solution", i.e. one vector directed at a south-east direction (the diving plane) and the lift force at a north-east direction.
 
One of the main things which confuses me is that I'm not at all sure what the lift force is. I looked at some pictures found on google and it seemed like the lift force is a vertical force, but that doesn't make sense, considering the fact that the lift force is supposed to be normal to the plane..
 
If acceleration is zero, then all the forces must sum to zero. So one of your force vectors is the lifting force normal to the velocity. Check. Your other force vector (south east) needs some more thought. What does it represent? Also don't forget about the force due to gravity (mg).
 
Ripe said:
One of the main things which confuses me is that I'm not at all sure what the lift force is. I looked at some pictures found on google and it seemed like the lift force is a vertical force, but that doesn't make sense, considering the fact that the lift force is supposed to be normal to the plane..

To respond to your sidebar question: If the plane is flying horizontally, the lift force would be a vertical force. If the plane was in a vertical dive, the lift force would be a horizontal force--making the plane want to recover. If you wanted to fly a plane straight down, you would actually have to adjust the controls to compensate for the horizontal lift force.
 
lewando said:
Your other force vector (south east) needs some more thought. What does it represent? Also don't forget about the force due to gravity (mg).

It represents the velocity of the airplane, doesn't it? And if I've done it correctly so far, mg should be its y-axis component. But it's from here that I get lost..
 
Ripe said:
It represents the velocity of the airplane, doesn't it? And if I've done it correctly so far, mg should be its y-axis component. But it's from here that I get lost..

Velocity is not a force. mg does have only a y-axis component. Along the axis of the plane's travel are 2 forces: thrust and air resistance. Think of it this way-- when you draw a FBD with mg and the lift force only, does it look like it will balance out to zero? No it will not (to save time--let me know if you disagree). There needs to be another force in opposition to the 2 forces. Since thrust and air resistance are constant and both unknown, consider combining them into an "opposing force" vector operating on the plane's axis of travel.
 
Ah! That explains why I'm only running around in circles. I was confused by the phrasing of the question and treated its diving motion as a force.. I agree with the fact that it won't balance out to zero, I'd say that there should be an opposing, left-ward, force.

If we call the lift force, F, then its vertical component should equal mg, right? If so, F should equal 25980/sin80=26381N. Is this correct?
 
  • #10
Unfortunately, the "leftward" opposing force isn't exactly leftward. It is along the axis of travel, in the "west-west-northwest" (170 degrees) direction. [edit-- by unfortunately, I mean you have a bit more work to do]
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Thanks for all your help, it's really helping me a lot (I'm studying physics from scratch by myself). A bit of logical thinking can go far. Of course the air resistance in a direction 180 degrees from the motion..

I think I've solved it now. Splitting up the two forces (Air resistance = O and lift force = R) into their components (excluding the gravity as its along the axis), yields the following:

Ry=Rsin(80)
Rx=Rcos(80)

O(y)=Osin(10)
Ox=-Ocos(10)

Now, the two vertical components should cancel out the force of gravity, whereas the horizontal components cancel each other out, giving us a simultaneous equation. Hence:

Rsin(80)+Osin(10)=25980
Rcos(80)-Ocos(10)=0

After eliminating one variable (O, since it'd give us the answer we want directly) and calculating R, we get it to equal 25585N. It'd take too long for me to write out all the steps as I'm not so used to writing stuff like these on a computer. Did you nevertheless get the same answer?
 
  • #12
Your setup looks right, but I get a different answer-- 19425 N (ignoring SDs for now, g=10). I am checking my math.
 
  • #13
I double-checked my calculations and got 25585N again.
 
  • #14
My bad. You are right. Congrats! Don't forget to consider sig-digs in your final answer. [edit-- perhaps use g=9.81m/s^2].
 
Last edited:
  • #15
lewando said:
My bad. You are right. Congrats! Don't forget to consider sig-digs in your final answer. [edit-- perhaps use g=9.81m/s^2].

Again, thank you very much for your help. You really clarified some things for me!
 
Back
Top