Finding the location of a kinematic particle in motion based on time.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the position of a kinematic particle in a 2D Cartesian coordinate system, specifically for a vehicle that moves forward and backward while rotating. Key parameters include initial velocity, forward acceleration, angular velocity, angular acceleration, and time, with the starting position set at the origin. The challenge arises when the particle experiences both forward and angular acceleration, resulting in a spiral path rather than a simple circular motion. The user seeks assistance in developing a method to determine the particle's position under these conditions, emphasizing the importance of knowing the acceleration vector and initial conditions. The discussion highlights the need for integration of acceleration to derive position and velocity over time.
Kaanin25
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello there, I have a problem that I've been trying to solve for some time now and I find myself struggling.

I am trying to develop a method of calculating the position of a particle using kinematic motion in a 2D Cartesian coordinates system given a set of starting values based on how much time has passed. In my case the particle is being used to represent a vehicle such as a car or otherwise that moves only forward and backward with no sideways motion and uses rotation to turn.

Just for further clarification I'm going to point out that given the above description, the rotation of the particle is important as it defines what is "forward" and "backward" for the particle and as such changes the line of motion.

The given values I have to work with are: v_i Initial Velocity, a_f Forward Acceleration, ω Angular Velocity, \alpha Angular Acceleration, and t Time.

The starting coordinates and rotation of the particle are all assumed to be starting at zero.
x = 0, y = 0, \theta = 0

If the particle is traveling in a straight line with no angular velocity or acceleration, calculating the position of the particle is easy using the kinematic formula for displacement.
d = v_i\times t + 1/2\times a_f\times t^2

And if the particle is traveling in a perfect circle with no acceleration it's not so bad because I can find the circumference, radius, and origin of the circle just looking at the forward and angular velocities and find its place on the circle based on that.

But if the particle has a forward acceleration or angular acceleration while turning, it is no longer a circle but a spiral path of motion. This is where I am failing to find a solution.

Any assistance anyone could lend would be greatly appreciated!
Thank you in advance, I will be back to check this post tomorrow.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't know if I get what you ask, but if you know

\vec{a}(t) = a_x(t)\vec{i} + a_y(t)\vec{j}

(i.e. if you know the acceleration vector at each time)

and you also know

\vec{r}(t_0) and \vec{v}(t_0)

(i.e. the position vector and velocity vector at one given time instant t_0 )

then you know \vec{r}(t) and \vec{v}(t) at any time t.


Because:


\vec{v}(t) = \vec{v}(t_0) + \int_{t_0}^t \vec{a}(s)ds


and


\vec{r}(t) = \vec{r}(t_0) + \vec{v}(t_0) (t-t_0) + \int_{t_0}^t\left(\int_{t_0}^s \vec{a}(w)dw\right)ds
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top