Finding the Magnitude of a Diplacement Vector

  • Thread starter Thread starter Love_to_Learn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnitude Vector
AI Thread Summary
Cavers traveled 2.6 km west, 3.9 km south, and 25 meters upward, leading to a displacement vector of r = -2600i - 3900j + 25k. The magnitude of this displacement vector was calculated as approximately 4.69 km. There was confusion regarding the difference between displacement and magnitude, with clarification that a displacement vector includes both magnitude and direction. The discussion emphasized the importance of understanding these terms correctly in vector analysis. Overall, the final magnitude of the displacement vector was confirmed as 4.69 km.
Love_to_Learn
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
1. Cavers spelunked 2.6 km westward, 3.9 southward, and 25 meters upward. What is their displacement vector?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

- The formula for the magnitude of a vector which is

sqrt of [(3.6)^2+(2.9)^2+(0.025)^2] ≈4.623 km
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let the point P1 lie at (-2600, -3900, 25).


Then OP1 will be a line segement whos magnitude is denoted as follows

sqr[ (-2600)^2 + (-3900)^2 + (25)^2 ] = 4687.28m = 4.69km

Looks about right, assuming it's 3.9km southward.

EDIT: I failed to read the question, The displacement vector would simply be r = -2600i -3900j + 25k, where i, j, k are the unit vectors of x, y, and z.

2nd EDIT: I reread the title and if you're looking for the magnitude of that displacement vector it is indeed 4.69km, sorry for the confusion.
 
Last edited:
Alright, then I am not understanding how to find a displacement vector. I thought that the displacement of a vector was the same as its magnitude. How is finding the displacement of a vector somehow different than finding the magnitude of a vector?
 
The displacement vector conveys both magnitude and direction. You have the distance, does the problem want direction as well?
 
How is finding the displacement of a vector somehow different than finding the magnitude of a vector?

I think you are mixing up terms, its not a vector with a displacement, its a displacement vector, this is a vector that defines displacement of an object based on another parameter(usually time).
 
jegues said:
I think you are mixing up terms, its not a vector with a displacement, its a displacement vector, this is a vector that defines displacement of an object based on another parameter(usually time).

You were exactly correct. That is what I was doing. Thanks for the replies everyone.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top