MHB Finding the Product of Roots of a Polynomial with Complex and Real Roots

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product Value
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the product of the polynomial function values at the roots of a given polynomial \( p(x) = x^5 + x^2 + 1 \) and another function \( q(x) = x^2 - 2 \). The original poster struggled with applying Vieta's formulas due to the complexity of the roots, which include one real root and four complex roots. A solution was provided, showing that the product \( q(r_1) \cdot q(r_2) \cdot q(r_3) \cdot q(r_4) \cdot q(r_5) \) can be calculated as \( -23 \) by evaluating the polynomial at \( \sqrt{2} \) and \( -\sqrt{2} \). The discussion concludes with appreciation for the responses received, highlighting the collaborative nature of problem-solving in mathematics.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Hi MHB,

It's me again...I find this problem to be very interesting yet very difficult to me. I tried to approach it using the Vieta's formula, knowing the given function $p(x)$ has only one real root and 4 complex roots, where I let the 4 complex roots be $a\pm bi$ and $c\pm di$, but it failed me. I start to think this must be a problem that is not compatible to my level and thus I post it here hoping to find someone who will be interested with it and solve it for me...:o

Thanks in advance!(Sun)

Problem:

Let $$p(x)=x^5+x^2+1$$ have roots $r_1$, $r_2$, $r_3$, $r_4$, and $r_5$. Let $$q(x)=x^2-2$$. Determine the product of $$q(r_1)\cdot q(r_2)\cdot q(r_3)\cdot q(r_4)\cdot q(r_5)$$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Let $$p(x)=x^5+x^2+1$$ have roots $r_1$, $r_2$, $r_3$, $r_4$, and $r_5$. Let $$q(x)=x^2-2$$. Determine the product of $$q(r_1)\cdot q(r_2)\cdot q(r_3)\cdot q(r_4)\cdot q(r_5)$$.
The product $$q(r_1)q(r_2)q(r_3)q(r_4)q(r_5)$$ is a symmetric polynomial in $r_1,\dots,r_5$, and every symmetric polynomial can be expressed through elementary symmetric polynomials, which, in turn, can be expressed through the coefficients of $p(x)$ by the Vieta's formulas. Finding this expression is left as an exercise. (Smile)
 
anemone said:
Let $$p(x)=x^5+x^2+1$$ have roots $r_1$, $r_2$, $r_3$, $r_4$, and $r_5$. Let $$q(x)=x^2-2$$. Determine the product of $$q(r_1)\cdot q(r_2)\cdot q(r_3)\cdot q(r_4)\cdot q(r_5)$$.
If $y = x^2 - 2$ then $x = (y+2)^{1/2}$, and $x^5+x^2+1 = (y+2)^{5/2} + y+3$. So if $r_1,\ldots,r_5$ are the roots of $p(x)$ then $q(r_1),\ldots,q(r_5)$ are the roots of $(y+2)^{5/2} + y+3$. But if $(y+2)^{5/2} + y+3 = 0$ then $(y+2)^5 = (y+3)^2$, so that $y^5 + \ldots + (2^5-3^2) = 0$. The product of the roots of that polynomial is the negative of the constant term, namely $-(32-9) = -23.$
 
anemone said:
Hi MHB,

It's me again...I find this problem to be very interesting yet very difficult to me. I tried to approach it using the Vieta's formula, knowing the given function $p(x)$ has only one real root and 4 complex roots, where I let the 4 complex roots be $a\pm bi$ and $c\pm di$, but it failed me. I start to think this must be a problem that is not compatible to my level and thus I post it here hoping to find someone who will be interested with it and solve it for me...:o

Thanks in advance!(Sun)

Problem:

Let $$p(x)=x^5+x^2+1$$ have roots $r_1$, $r_2$, $r_3$, $r_4$, and $r_5$. Let $$q(x)=x^2-2$$. Determine the product of $$q(r_1)\cdot q(r_2)\cdot q(r_3)\cdot q(r_4)\cdot q(r_5)$$.

Is... $\displaystyle p(x) = \prod_{i=1}^{5} (x-r_{i})\ (1)$

... and... $\displaystyle q(x) = (x-\sqrt{2}) (x+\sqrt{2})\ (2)$

... so that... $\displaystyle \prod_{i=1}^{5} q(r_{i}) = \prod_{i=1}^{5} (r_{i} - \sqrt{2}) \prod_{i=1}^{5} (r_{i} + \sqrt{2}) = - p(\sqrt{2})\ p(-\sqrt{2}) = (3 - 2^{\frac{5}{2}})\ (3 + 2^{\frac{5}{2}}) = 9 - 32 = -23\ (3)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Last edited:
Evgeny.Makarov said:
The product $$q(r_1)q(r_2)q(r_3)q(r_4)q(r_5)$$ is a symmetric polynomial in $r_1,\dots,r_5$, and every symmetric polynomial can be expressed through elementary symmetric polynomials, which, in turn, can be expressed through the coefficients of $p(x)$ by the Vieta's formulas. Finding this expression is left as an exercise. (Smile)

Opalg said:
If $y = x^2 - 2$ then $x = (y+2)^{1/2}$, and $x^5+x^2+1 = (y+2)^{5/2} + y+3$. So if $r_1,\ldots,r_5$ are the roots of $p(x)$ then $q(r_1),\ldots,q(r_5)$ are the roots of $(y+2)^{5/2} + y+3$. But if $(y+2)^{5/2} + y+3 = 0$ then $(y+2)^5 = (y+3)^2$, so that $y^5 + \ldots + (2^5-3^2) = 0$. The product of the roots of that polynomial is the negative of the constant term, namely $-(32-9) = -23.$

chisigma said:
Is... $\displaystyle p(x) = \prod_{i=1}^{5} (x-r_{i})\ (1)$

... and... $\displaystyle q(x) = (x-\sqrt{2}) (x+\sqrt{2})\ (2)$

... so that... $\displaystyle \prod_{i=1}^{5} q(r_{i}) = \prod_{i=1}^{5} (r_{i} - \sqrt{2}) \prod_{i=1}^{5} (r_{i} + \sqrt{2}) = - p(\sqrt{2})\ p(\sqrt{2}) = (3 - 2^{\frac{5}{2}})\ (3 + 2^{\frac{5}{2}}) = 9 - 32 = -23\ (3)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

Thank you, Evgeny.Makarov, Opalg and chisigma for the reply!

I truly appreciate the three of you taking the time out to reply to this thread because I learned a great deal from the replies...

I love you guys!(Inlove)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top