Engineering Finding the step response of RL circuit

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding the step response of an RL circuit, specifically addressing confusion over the calculation of steady-state current and the application of current division. Participants question the origin of a 3A current and the use of the unit step function u(t) in the solution. Clarifications reveal that the 3A is derived from manipulating the circuit equations, but there is disagreement about the interpretation of the terms involved, particularly regarding the absence of a 6-ohm resistor. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately identifying circuit components and their relationships to avoid misunderstandings in circuit analysis. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for clear communication and precise calculations in electrical engineering problems.
Vishera
Messages
72
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A6mytYF.png


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I understand everything except how they got i(∞). It seems like they used current division on 3A. But where are they applying current division and where did they get 3A? Also, in the last step, they magically added u(t). Where did they get that from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like they failed to specify that the magnitude of the step for Vs was 18 V.
 
gneill said:
Looks like they failed to specify that the magnitude of the step for Vs was 18 V.

Oh, opps. That was my mistake. It looks like the problem is slightly different in two places.

Here's the problem:

qszXlHS.png


But I still don't see where they got the 3A and where u(t) in the last step came from.
 
Supposing that the source voltage will be 18 V for "a long time", what current be the steady state current provided by the source?

The u(t) specifies that the solution pertains to time t > 0 since the source is stepped from 0 V to 18 V according to 18u(t) V.
 
You can write (18-v)/6 = v(1/3 + 1/4).
So 3 = v(1/6 + 1/3 + 1/4) = v(1/2 + 1/4)

So there's your 3A on the left ...

and i = v/4 = 3/(4/2 + 4/4) = 3*2/(4+2) = 1A for i(infinity).

Just how he managed to get to 3*2/(4+2) immediately I don't know.
 
gneill said:
Supposing that the source voltage will be 18 V for "a long time", what current be the steady state current provided by the source?

The u(t) specifies that the solution pertains to time t > 0 since the source is stepped from 0 V to 18 V according to 18u(t) V.

Would the below be correct?

09GIrQr.png


$$\frac { v-18 }{ 6 } +\frac { v-0 }{ 3 } +\frac { v-0 }{ 4 } =0\\ v=4\\ \\ i(∞)=\frac { v-0 }{ 4 } =1\quad A$$

rude man said:
You can write (18-v)/6 = v(1/3 + 1/4).
So 3 = v(1/6 + 1/3 + 1/4) = v(1/2 + 1/4)

So there's your 3A on the left ...

I can see how you manipulated that equation to get 3A on the left side but I don't understand what the right side means. On the right side, we have a sum of 3 currents: v/6, v/3, and v/4. v/3 is the current from v to ground through the 3-ohm resistor. v/4 is the current from v to ground through the 4-ohm resistor. But what is v/6? It can't be the current from v to ground through the 6-ohm resistor because a 6-ohm resistor doesn't exist between v and ground. I just don't see where the 3A current is on the circuit.
 
Vishera said:
Would the below be correct?

09GIrQr.png


$$\frac { v-18 }{ 6 } +\frac { v-0 }{ 3 } +\frac { v-0 }{ 4 } =0\\ v=4\\ \\ i(∞)=\frac { v-0 }{ 4 } =1\quad A$$



I can see how you manipulated that equation to get 3A on the left side but I don't understand what the right side means. On the right side, we have a sum of 3 currents: v/6, v/3, and v/4. v/3 is the current from v to ground through the 3-ohm resistor. v/4 is the current from v to ground through the 4-ohm resistor. But what is v/6? It can't be the current from v to ground through the 6-ohm resistor because a 6-ohm resistor doesn't exist between v and ground. I just don't see where the 3A current is on the circuit.

You're looking for an actual 3A in the circuit where none exists. The 3A is just the result of rewriting my original equation which simply says that the current from the source to the v node = the sum of currents from the v node to ground.
 
rude man said:
the current from the source to the v node = the sum of currents from the v node to ground.

I disagree here. On the right side, you had the term v/6 which is not a current from the v node to ground because there isn't a 6-ohm resistor between the v node and ground.
 
Vishera said:
I disagree here. On the right side, you had the term v/6 which is not a current from the v node to ground because there isn't a 6-ohm resistor between the v node and ground.

"I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." :smile:
Voltaire
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K