Finding the total gravitational potential energy of a gas cloud

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total gravitational potential energy of a spherical interstellar gas cloud with uniform density. The gravitational force acting on a thin spherical shell is expressed as F=4πGM(r)ρ(r)Δr, which is crucial for deriving the energy of the shell. To find the total potential energy, one must integrate this force over the mass of the cloud, considering the energy required to bring a shell of mass dM from infinity to a radius r. The desired result for the total gravitational potential energy is Egrav=-3/5*(GM^2/R). The integration process is essential for arriving at this formula.
TheTourist
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
An interstellar gas cloud can be roughly described as spherical with a uniform density. Its radius is R and its total mass M.
By considering the gravitational potential energy of a thin spherical shell, show that the total potential energy of the cloud is given by:
Egrav=-\frac{3}{5}*\frac{GM^2}{R}​


Ok, so I believe that I need to find the gravitational force acting on this shell, which I have found to be
F=4\piGM(r)\rho(r)\deltar​
and I must integrate this to find energy of the shell, and then integrate over the mass to find the total energy, but I am failing to get the desired result.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of it more as if you had a shell with mass dM. And you brought it in from infinity to a solid sphere of mass M.

So write out the differential change in potential energy to bring a shell of mass dM from infinity to 'r'.

This is what you will want to integrate.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top