MHB Finding the Value of $f(84)$ in an Integer Function

AI Thread Summary
To find the value of f(84) in the given integer function, the function is defined piecewise, with f(x) equaling x-3 for x greater than or equal to 1000, and f(f(x+5)) for x less than 1000. Since 84 is less than 1000, the recursive nature of the function means that f(84) requires evaluating f(f(89)), and this process continues with increasing values until reaching a point where x is greater than or equal to 1000. The function's recursive structure suggests that it will eventually lead to a base case that can be calculated directly. The final value of f(84) is determined through this iterative process, ultimately yielding a specific integer result.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
$\text{given } :x \in\mathbb{Z}$

$f(x)= \begin{cases}x-3 & x \geq 1000 \\f\big [f(x+5)\big ]& x<1000 \end{cases} $

$\text{find } :\,\, f(84)$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Albert said:
$\text{given } :x \in\mathbb{Z}$

$f(x)= \begin{cases}x-3 & x \geq 1000 \\f\big [f(x+5)\big ]& x<1000 \end{cases} $

$\text{find } :\,\, f(84)$

Lemma
$f(x)= \begin{cases}
x-3 & x \geq 1000 \\
997 & x<1000 \text{ and $x$ even} \\
998 & x<1000 \text{ and $x$ odd} \\
\end{cases} $

Proof
Use full induction going down.
Initial condition: we can verify that it is true for any $x \ge 997$.
Induction step: suppose it is true for any $x$ and some $y$ with $y < x$ and $y< 997$.
Then we need to distinguish the cases that $y$ is even or $y$ is odd.
When we fill in what we already have for $f(y)$ it follows that the given formula is also true for $f(y)$, which completes the proof.

Using the lemma we find that $f(84) = 997$.
 
I like Serena said:
Lemma
$f(x)= \begin{cases}
x-3 & x \geq 1000 \\
997 & x<1000 \text{ and $x$ even} \\
998 & x<1000 \text{ and $x$ odd} \\
\end{cases} $

Proof
Use full induction going down.
Initial condition: we can verify that it is true for any $x \ge 997$.
Induction step: suppose it is true for any $x$ and some $y$ with $y < x$ and $y< 997$.
Then we need to distinguish the cases that $y$ is even or $y$ is odd.
When we fill in what we already have for $f(y)$ it follows that the given formula is also true for $f(y)$, which completes the proof.

Using the lemma we find that $f(84) = 997$.
I like Serena :very smart induction (Clapping)
 
My approach is different from I like serena

we evaluate f(999) through f(995)

f(999) = 998
f(998) = 997
f(997) = 998
f(996) = 997
f(995) = 998

now f(85)= f^183 (998) notation for f is applied 183

applying f twice gives 998 and so on applying 182 time gives 998 and then once more gives 997 which is the ans
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top