Finding the Value of pq When Lines Bisect Each Other

  • Thread starter Thread starter zorro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lines Value
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the value of pq given two pairs of lines represented by the equations x^2-2pxy-y^2=0 and x^2-2qxy-y^2=0, under the condition that each pair bisects the angle between the other pair. Participants are exploring the implications of the angle bisector condition and the relationships between the parameters p and q.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to clarify the meaning of the angle bisector condition and seeks guidance on how to approach the problem. Some participants discuss the relationship between the slopes of the lines and the implications of the angle bisector property. Others express confusion regarding a specific method presented in a textbook and seek further understanding of the derivation of a related formula.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing insights and methods while expressing confusion about certain steps. Some have reported progress using suggested approaches, but there remains a lack of consensus on the textbook's explanation and its relevance to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the textbook does not provide clear explanations for certain steps, leading to confusion. There is also mention of the need to derive relationships between the slopes of the lines and the parameters involved.

zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If the pair of lines x^2-2pxy-y^2=0 and x^2-2qxy-y^2=0 are such that each pair bisects the angle between the other pair, then what is the value of pq?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I don't understand what 'each pair bisects the angle between the other pair' mean.
Is it that each line of first pair bisects the angle between the two lines of other pair (obtuse and acute angle)?.
How do I proceed with this question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes pretty much. The lines in each equation are perpendicular to each other and this can be proven by showing that the first line satisfies:

[tex]y=(-p\pm\sqrt{p^2+1})x[/tex] and thus if [tex]m_1=-p+\sqrt{p^2+1}[/tex] and [tex]m_2=-p-\sqrt{p^2+1}[/tex] then [tex]m_1m_2=-1[/tex]

And obviously since it's saying that p and q are chosen such that each pair of lines bisect each other, if we take anyone line, then the other line from the other equation will have an angle difference of [itex]\pi/4[/itex] radians (since bisecting an angle of [itex]\pi/2[/itex] is half of that).

So we have [tex]m_p=-p\pm\sqrt{p^2+1}[/tex] and [tex]m_q=-q\pm\sqrt{q^2+1}[/tex].

since the gradient [tex]m_p=tan\theta[/tex] then [tex]m_q=tan(\theta+\frac{\pi}{4})=\frac{1+tan\theta}{1-tan\theta}=\frac{1+m_p}{1-m_p}[/tex]

Can you proceed from here?
 
In my book, it is done this way.

The second pair must be identical with (x^2-y^2)/[1-(-1)] = xy/-p

i.e. x^2 + (2/p)xy - y^2=0. Consequently, 2/p=-2q
i.e. pq=-1

I don't understand any thing from this. What is done here?
And what is the next step in your method?
 
Neither can I :bugeye:

"The second pair must be identical with (x^2-y^2)/[1-(-1)] = xy/-p"

This line has completely stumped me on what they mean. Does it give any other information?

For my solution we have the equation

[tex]m_q=\frac{1+m_p}{1-m_p}[/tex] where [tex]m_q=-q\pm\sqrt{q^2+1}, m_p=-p\pm\sqrt{p^2+1}[/tex]

Substituting mq into the equation:

[tex]-q\pm\sqrt{q^2+1}=\frac{1+m_p}{1-m_p}[/tex]

Now solve for q, simplify, then substitute for mp and simplify further till you get the desired result.
 
Unfortunately, nothing is mentioned.
Anyway I got the answer by your method (though it is a bit long :p)
Thanks a lot.
 
I agree, it is. I'd also like to know what your book meant by that... You got to love how they don't even bother to give a reasonable explanation, while with other solutions they take you through it step by step so slowly, it makes you jump pages at a time to get to the point.
 
Yeah, very true.
 
You wanted to know what my book meant by that...
For ax^2 +2hxy + by^2 = 0 the angle bisector is given as...

x^2 - y^2 / ( a-b) = xy / h

This is a formula I got from my friend.
 
And how was that formula derived?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K