Finding Uncertainty of the Second Derivative

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the uncertainty of acceleration derived from the position vs. time equation s(t) = 0.205t² + 0.3001t. The constant acceleration is determined to be a(t) = 0.410. Uncertainty in position is given as ±0.005, and uncertainty in time is ±0.15. The user seeks guidance on applying uncertainty propagation techniques to derive the uncertainty of acceleration, utilizing formulas for uncertainty in both position and time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically differentiation
  • Familiarity with the concept of uncertainty propagation
  • Knowledge of basic physics equations of motion
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate equations involving uncertainties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of uncertainty propagation in physics
  • Learn how to apply differentiation to derive velocity and acceleration equations
  • Research methods for calculating uncertainty in derived quantities
  • Explore resources on error analysis in experimental physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those involved in experimental mechanics and data analysis, will benefit from this discussion.

Gerst
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey there,

I have a problem to do, in which I need to determine the acceleration of an object and the uncertainty of the acceleration. The position vs. time equation is given by:

s(t) = 0.205t2 + 0.3001t

Therefore, after differentiation, I can state the the velocity vs. time equation is:

v(t) = 0.410t + 0.3001

And that the acceleration of my object is:

a(t) = 0.410

The acceleration is constant, and this is the number that I'm looking for. However, I don't know how to calculate the uncertainty of the acceleration.

I know that the uncertainty of the position for the s(t) equation is +/- 0.005, and that the uncertainty of the time is +/- 0.15. How do I determine the uncertainty of the acceleration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The way I understand propagation of uncertainty, you'll use the following analysis:

Position function: s = s0 + v0*t + (a*t^2)/2
It looks like s0 is zero, so we get: s = v0*t + (a*t^2)/2
The uncertainty can be calculated as: u(s) = u[v0*t+(at^2)/2]
=> u(v0*t) = v0*t*SQRT[(u(v0)/v0)^2+(u(t)/t)^2]
=> substitute into: u(s) = u(v0*t)+u(at^2/2)
=> u(at^2/2)=1/2 u(a*t^2)
=> u(at^2) = a*t^2*SQRT[(u(a)/a)^2+(u(t^2)/t^2)^2]
=> u(t^2) = 2*t*u(t)

This makes the total uncertainty:

u(s) = v0*t*SQRT[(u(v0)/v0)^2+(u(t)/t)^2]+1/2*a*t^2*SQRT[(u(a)/a)^2+(2*u(t)/t)^2]

You can solve for the u(a) from this equation, but you might need the u(v0). If you don't have it, then I think you can just use u(v0)=0. That would be my approach. I used the equations from the following website: http://www.physics.uc.edu/~bortner/...pendix 2/Appendix 2 Error Propagation htm.htm
 
When you write v0, do you mean v-not, a.k.a. v0?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K