Finding V_o and i_o for an Ideal Op Amp Circuit with Multiple Unknowns

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rozenwyn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amp Op amp
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the output voltage (V_o) and output current (i_o) for an ideal operational amplifier (op amp) circuit with multiple unknowns. Participants explore the application of circuit analysis techniques, specifically Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL), and the implications of the virtual short principle in op amp circuits.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in applying KCL due to having two equations with three unknowns.
  • Another participant introduces the virtual short principle, stating that the inputs of the op amp are at the same potential, suggesting that v1 is -2V.
  • A participant calculates v2 and i_o but finds discrepancies with textbook answers, leading to further confusion about the values of V_o and i_o.
  • Questions arise regarding the voltage levels at various nodes, particularly the designation of ground and the implications of having a node at -10V.
  • Clarifications are made about the labeling of nodes, with some participants correcting each other on the values assigned to v1 and v2.
  • There is a discussion about the potential misuse of the ground symbol in the circuit diagram, with one participant noting that the ground should represent 0V.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the circuit diagram's accuracy and the implications of the voltage sources on the node potentials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct values for V_o and i_o, and there are multiple competing views regarding the labeling and interpretation of the circuit diagram. The discussion remains unresolved with respect to the final calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about node voltages and the potential confusion stemming from the circuit diagram's labeling. The discussion highlights the dependence on accurate definitions and the need for clarity in circuit representations.

Rozenwyn
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Find [tex]V_o[/tex] and [tex]i_o[/tex]. Assume an ideal op amp.

http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/2426/633bb0.jpg

I tried applying KCL at v1 and v2 nodes but then got stuck because I had 2 equations with 3 unknowns.

[tex]\frac{12-v_1}{4} = \frac{v_1-v_2}{8}[/tex] and

[tex]\frac{v_1-v_2}{8}+\frac{-10-v_2}{20}= i_o[/tex]

Where [tex]i_o[/tex] is the output current of the op amp and not the current flowing thru the 8 Ohm resistor ? I missed a few lectures on Op Amps and now I am trying to catch up from the book but I am having a hard time with it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that an op-amp actively drives its output so as to make its inputs equal. This results in what is known as the virtual short principle, which essentially just says that the two inputs of an op-amp are always at the same potential. The non-inverting terminal is obviously at -2V, so v1 is also at -2V.

- Warren
 
Ok I took [tex]v_2 = -2[/tex] and did the calculations but I still don't get the right answers.
The answers given in the textbook are [tex]v_o = -30V[/tex] and [tex]i_o=3.5mA[/tex]

Here are my calculations:

[tex]\frac{12-^-2}{4}= \frac{-2-v_2}{8} \ \longrightarrow 28 = -2-v_2 \ \longrightarrow v_2 = -30V[/tex]

[tex]\frac{-2-^-30}{8} + \frac{-10-^-30}{8} = i_o \ \longrightarrow i_o = \frac{28+8}{8} = 4 mA[/tex]

From these [tex]v_o = v_2 - v_1 = -30 -^-10= -20V[/tex].

These are wrong. However if we take the [tex]i_o[/tex] to be the current between nodes v2 and v1 then; [tex]\frac{-2-^-30}{8} = \frac{28}{8} = 3.5mA[/tex]. This is rigth but [tex]v_o[/tex] is still wrong?
 
Why is v2 = -2V? Why is the voltage of the node at the bottom-right -10V? And how is v0 = v2-v1?
 
Look at where V0 is. In this case V0 = V2

I'm a bit confused as to why there is a -10V at the bottom since there's a ground there.

Also you really don't want to use the node at V2, cause you also need to account for the current coming out of the op amp. I believe there is one coming out, but someone correct me on that. Been awhile since i did some circuits.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, I guess the node labelled "ground" is actually at -10V, therefore the voltage at the noninverting input of the op-amp is -12V, and thus v2 = -12V too.

The ground symbol should really not be used to mean anything other than 0V though, so I consider this to be an abuse of notation.

- Warren
 
You can't have ground at -10V and then have the node at the top-left be +12V. I think the poster have to reexamine the labels she/he attached to the circuit.

chroot said:
Sorry, I guess the node labelled "ground" is actually at -10V, therefore the voltage at the noninverting input of the op-amp is -12V, and thus v2 = -12V too.
I think you meant v1 = -12V and not v2 = -12V.
 
doodle said:
You can't have ground at -10V and then have the node at the top-left be +12V. I think the poster have to reexamine the labels she/he attached to the circuit.

Indeed, I didn't notice that. The diagram doesn't make sense.

I think you meant v1 = -12V and not v2 = -12V.

Sorry, yes, that's what I meant.

- Warren
 
Oh it's my bad. I disregarded ground for a minute and thought the Voltage Sources would create a potential of -10V over there. ( -12 + 2 V ). Meh.
Then as technodude says, v0 = v2 and the problem is solved. Thanks all. Sorry to confuse you with a bad diagram.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K