Finding x in cos(x)=exp(-2x): Analytical Solutions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analytical
AI Thread Summary
The equation cos(x) = exp(-2x) has known solutions at x=0 and approximately x=1.5232, but finding analytical solutions is complex due to the involvement of transcendental functions. It is generally accepted that there is no straightforward algebraic method to solve such equations. Graphical analysis reveals that the solutions occur infinitely often, approaching the zeroes of cos(x) near integral multiples of pi/2. As x increases, the exponential term diminishes, confirming the trend observed in numerical plots. Overall, while numerical methods can identify solutions, an analytical approach remains elusive.
Swest
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello all

Can anybody see a way to analytically find x in the expression:

cos(x) = exp(-2x)

By inspection x=0 is obvious, and numerically we find x=1.5232 is also a solution, but is there a way to find these values by rearranging the above expression? It's one of those that looks simple but isn't, any ideas?

Many thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That is not "simple" algebra. What you are attempting to do is solve an equation involving two different transcendental functions. In general there is no simple way to do that.
 
Thanks, I suspected as much. Always nice to be reassured that one isn't missing something obvious.
 
graphing them is instructive as it shows the graphs meet infinitely often, at points that become closer and closer to the zeroes of cos(x),

i.e. the solutions approach closer and closer to the integral multiples of pi/2.
 
mathwonk said:
graphing them is instructive as it shows the graphs meet infinitely often, at points that become closer and closer to the zeroes of cos(x),

i.e. the solutions approach closer and closer to the integral multiples of pi/2.

that make sense seeing as for large x the exponential is vanishing.
 
Yes, I did a quick MATLAB plot of the two and saw the trend that you describe, which again can be surmised from inspection, indeed the 2nd solution is very close to pi/2.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top