Finding x in cos(x)=exp(-2x): Analytical Solutions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analytical
Swest
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello all

Can anybody see a way to analytically find x in the expression:

cos(x) = exp(-2x)

By inspection x=0 is obvious, and numerically we find x=1.5232 is also a solution, but is there a way to find these values by rearranging the above expression? It's one of those that looks simple but isn't, any ideas?

Many thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That is not "simple" algebra. What you are attempting to do is solve an equation involving two different transcendental functions. In general there is no simple way to do that.
 
Thanks, I suspected as much. Always nice to be reassured that one isn't missing something obvious.
 
graphing them is instructive as it shows the graphs meet infinitely often, at points that become closer and closer to the zeroes of cos(x),

i.e. the solutions approach closer and closer to the integral multiples of pi/2.
 
mathwonk said:
graphing them is instructive as it shows the graphs meet infinitely often, at points that become closer and closer to the zeroes of cos(x),

i.e. the solutions approach closer and closer to the integral multiples of pi/2.

that make sense seeing as for large x the exponential is vanishing.
 
Yes, I did a quick MATLAB plot of the two and saw the trend that you describe, which again can be surmised from inspection, indeed the 2nd solution is very close to pi/2.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top