Medical Finger tapping test L-R inequality

  • Thread starter Thread starter tonyjeffs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Test
AI Thread Summary
Finger tapping tests reveal a significant speed discrepancy between dominant and non-dominant hands, often attributed to muscle memory and neurological factors. Athletes demonstrate that injuries can disrupt these learned routines, leading to further complications if not addressed promptly. The discussion raises questions about the evolutionary basis for hand dominance, suggesting that one-sided dominance may have advantages despite seeming inefficient. Evolution operates through random mutations and natural selection rather than intentional design, leading to varying dexterity between hands. Understanding these dynamics can shed light on broader issues of bilateral symmetry and motor skills.
tonyjeffs
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Alternately tapping my first and second finger...
I can do this 20% faster with my left hand than my right hand.
Is it possible to speed this up, or is it a fixed property of my adult nerves?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Are you left-handed?
 
Yes.

I wonder what the typical discrepency in dexterity is between the fingers of the dominant and the secondary hand.
 
Part of the reason for this discrepency is muscle memory.

This was first noticed in athletes who suffered injuries to joints. If they were not encouraged to begin using the joint again as soon as possible they were more prone to suffer further injuries to that joint. Studies showed that our muscles learn specific little routines to cope with the high speed demands we make of them. The human brain alone cannot do all the parrallel processessing necessary to orchestrate every little motion when when time is of the essense. When injured, our muscles can quickly forget these routines and when our brains try to draw on them again in their absense disaster can strike.

You might find the same is true for other joints on your body, that differing sides have differing abilities in this reguard. This can be influenced by the amount of billateral symmetry you possess, among other factors.
 
Last edited:
Why has evolution bothered to design one sided dominance?Surely it would have been more efficient to give equal powers to both sides.There must be a fundamental reason for this set up.
 
veloman said:
Why has evolution bothered to design one sided dominance?Surely it would have been more efficient to give equal powers to both sides.There must be a fundamental reason for this set up.

Because evolution doesn't "design" anything. There's no "giving" of anything. New traits appear by chance, beneficial ones remain, detrimental ones decrease in the population, and neutral ones may come and go.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top