Finite and infinitesimal Rotations

2 replies · 2K views · last reply
Josh1079
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm not sure about where I should post this question, so sorry in advance if I posted it in the wrong place.

My question is basically this screenshot. So I really have some difficulty in understanding the two equations. I mean how can it not be equal? I understand that rotations are non-commutative, but I really don't see why mathematically these two lines are not equal. Doesn't that violate the properties of matrix exponentials?

Thanks!

Typeset equations: R_u(θ) = exp[-iθu·L] for a generic rotation about axis u, and R_u(θ) ≠ exp[-iθu_x L_x] exp[-iθu_y L_y] exp[-iθu_z L_z], noting that L_x, L_y, L_z do not commute.
 
In general, if ##A## and ##B## are non-commuting operators, ##e^{A+B} \neq e^A e^B##. You can see this most easily by expanding each side in a Taylor series. The general solution is known as the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula.

EDIT: actually, probably the easiest way to see this is to note that ##e^{A+B}=e^{B+A}## but ##e^A e^B \neq e^B e^A## for noncommuting ##A## and ##B##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mathwonk
Ah...I see that now...didn't think it carefully enough

Thanks TeethWhitener!