Finite Difference (Interpolating Polynomial)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of finite difference methods in the context of interpolating polynomials, specifically focusing on the calculation of second differences and their relation to derivatives. Participants are exploring how to derive the second derivative from finite differences and clarifying the notation used in the problem statement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of first and second differences, questioning the notation and the relationship between Δx and its squared form. There are attempts to clarify how to approach the limit as Δx approaches zero and how to interpret the results in terms of derivatives.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on simplifying expressions and clarifying the relationship between finite differences and derivatives. Some participants express confusion about specific steps, while others offer suggestions to replace Δx with h to avoid misunderstandings.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the notation used in the problem, particularly concerning the association of squares with Δx versus the differences themselves. Participants are also grappling with the implications of taking limits and how that relates to the expected derivatives.

planauts
Messages
86
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://puu.sh/1QFsA

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I'm actually not sure how to do this question. How do i find Δx^2. I kind of understand the question but I don't know how to prove it. I know that Δy becomes dy when the width becomes infinitesimally small (Ʃ (infinity)). And y'' is basically the second derivative... but I have no clue how to go about verifying this...

This is my attempt:
http://puu.sh/1QFqE

I, myself, think it looks more like gibberish. Could someone nudge me to the right direction, please? Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have calculated ##y_0,\,y_1,\,y_2##. The first differences are ##y_1-y_0, y_2-y_1##, as you have calculated. Simplify them both by adding the fractions. Then take their difference and simplify it similarly. That will give you ##\Delta^2y_0##. Then divide that by ##\Delta^2x## and take the limit as ##\Delta x\rightarrow 0##. Just push it through and determine whether it gives the second derivative of ##\frac 1 x## at ##x=x_0## or not.
 
But the question asks for http://puu.sh/1QKd3 , and you are saying to divide http://puu.sh/1QKeC by http://puu.sh/1QKdV . The square is associated with x, rather than delta. Also, when I take the second difference of x, I get zero...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
planauts said:
But the question asks for http://puu.sh/1QKd3 , and you are saying to divide http://puu.sh/1QKeC by http://puu.sh/1QKdV . The square is associated with x, rather than delta. Also, when I take the second difference of x, I get zero...

You don't need ##\Delta x^2## (not ##\Delta^2 x##); that is just "notation", the same as ##dx^2## is merely a notation in differentiation. We have ##\Delta y / \Delta x## = first divided-difference, and so ##\Delta^2 y / \Delta x^2## = second divided difference = divided difference of the divided differences.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
planauts said:
But the question asks for http://puu.sh/1QKd3 , and you are saying to divide http://puu.sh/1QKeC by http://puu.sh/1QKdV . The square is associated with x, rather than delta. Also, when I take the second difference of x, I get zero...

Yes, I meant ##\Delta x^2 = (\Delta x)^2## as stated in the problem. That's why I almost (and should have) suggested you use ##h## instead of ##\Delta x## when working that problem. Using ##h^2## there would have been no typo and no misunderstanding.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
LCKurtz said:
You have calculated ##y_0,\,y_1,\,y_2##. The first differences are ##y_1-y_0, y_2-y_1##, as you have calculated. Simplify them both by adding the fractions. Then take their difference and simplify it similarly. That will give you ##\Delta^2y_0##. Then divide that by ##\Delta^2x## and take the limit as ##\Delta x\rightarrow 0##. Just push it through and determine whether it gives the second derivative of ##\frac 1 x## at ##x=x_0## or not.

http://puu.sh/1QMxk

I'm still very confused about the "Then divide that by Δ^2x and take the limit as Δx→0."

I got it simplified using CAS, and replaced Δx by h like you suggested. However, how do I convert that into an derivative. If I just take the limit as h->0, then it would be 0 and the derivative that I need is 2/x^2.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
planauts said:
http://puu.sh/1QMxk

I'm still very confused about the "Then divide that by Δ^2x and take the limit as Δx→0."

I got it simplified using CAS, and replaced Δx by h like you suggested. However, how do I convert that into an derivative. If I just take the limit as h->0, then it would be 0 and the derivative that I need is 2/x^2.

Your steps look OK. Weren't you asked to divide by ##(\Delta x)^2=h^2## before you let ##h\rightarrow 0##? And hopefully you will get the second derivative.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks a lot! It makes sense now. The question was so confusing but it is actually a very simple question!

Thanks again everyone for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K