Finite difference Schrodinger equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation for electrons in a cylindrical potential well, specifically addressing the application of the inverse Laplacian to electron density. The user encounters an issue where the correction to the potential profile does not exhibit expected circular symmetry, leading to an asymmetrical correction profile. The discussion highlights potential causes for this anomaly, including numerical errors related to the grid indexing and the calculation of second-order derivatives using nearby points. The user ultimately indicates a breakthrough in understanding the issue.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger equation and its numerical solutions
  • Familiarity with Poisson's equation and its applications in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of finite difference methods for numerical differentiation
  • Experience with 2D grid indexing and mesh generation in computational simulations
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate numerical stability in finite difference methods for quantum simulations
  • Learn about advanced techniques for applying the inverse Laplacian in cylindrical coordinates
  • Explore error propagation in numerical simulations of partial differential equations
  • Study the implications of boundary conditions on potential profiles in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and practitioners in computational physics, particularly those focused on quantum mechanics simulations, numerical analysts, and anyone working on solving the Schrödinger equation in complex geometries.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
I am simulating electrons inside a cylindrical well like the one shown on the first figure.
My current work has been on solving the Schrödinger equation numerically for the above potential and then finding corrections to the solution such that it is consistent with Poissons equation.
To do so I need to apply the inverse Laplacian to the electron density as shown in figure 2, which will give me the correction to the potential profile (at least in the first iteration). The problem is however, that applying the inverse Laplacian to the electron density shown gives me a correction as shown on figure 3. As seen it makes sense that this is peaked around the origin, since the electron density is highest at this point. What however doesn't make sense, is that it curves upwards in one direction and doesn't go to zero in a spherically symmetric manner. Everything in my problem has circular symmetry, so I have no idea why it doesn't go to zero with circular symmetry. Does anyone have an idea why this can be? Is it a numerical problem? I doubt so since my mesh size is not very big.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    6.8 KB · Views: 786
  • 2.png
    2.png
    12 KB · Views: 766
  • 3.png
    3.png
    13.5 KB · Views: 761
Physics news on Phys.org
It's hard to answer without more details of the method you use. It could indeed be due to the propagation of an error. Looking at figure 3, the correction seems to be symmetric along the right axis, but not the left axis. Is your calculation starting from the negative end of the left axis and then proceeds from negative to positive values of the left axis?
 
My 2d grid is indexed like the one attached. It starts at one corner and then the value of the wave function at each point on the grid represents an entry in an NxN dimensional vector.
 

Attachments

  • grid.png
    grid.png
    17.1 KB · Views: 751
For a given point the second order derivative is calculated using 4 points in the vicinity as marked by the red cross on the this figure. I guess this causes problems for points on the edge.
 

Attachments

  • grid.png
    grid.png
    10.8 KB · Views: 754
hmm I think I figured it out
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K