LagrangeEuler
- 711
- 22
I am not sure how is it possible that asymetric potential well does not have bond states if ##E<U_1<U_2##. In symmetric case solution always exists. Why this is a case?
The discussion revolves around the existence of bound states in asymmetric finite square wells compared to symmetric ones, focusing on the conditions under which bound states can be found in these potential wells. The scope includes theoretical considerations and mathematical reasoning related to quantum mechanics.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the existence of bound states in asymmetric potential wells, with multiple competing views presented regarding the conditions under which bound states may or may not exist.
The discussion highlights potential misunderstandings regarding the conditions for bound states in asymmetric versus symmetric wells, but does not resolve the underlying mathematical or conceptual uncertainties.
I may be misunderstanding the question here... The asymmetric finite square well does have bound state solutions.LagrangeEuler said:I am not sure how is it possible that asymetric potential well does not have bond states if ##E<U_1<U_2##. In symmetric case solution always exists. Why this is a case?