MHB Calculating $$\sum_{0 \le k \le n}(-1)^k k^n \binom{n}{k}$$

  • Thread starter Thread starter MountEvariste
  • Start date Start date
MountEvariste
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
Find the value of $$\sum_{0 \le k \le n}(-1)^k k^n \binom{n}{k}. $$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The answer is:

$\sum_{k=0}^{n}(-1)^kk^n\binom{n}{k} = (-1)^nn!\;\;\;\;(1)$

In order to show the identity, we need the following lemma:

$\sum_{k=0}^{n}(-1)^kk^m\binom{n}{k} = 0 , \, \, \, \, m = 0,1,.., n-1.\;\;\; (2)$

Proof by induction:

Consider the binomial identity: $(1-x)^n =\sum_{j=0}^{n}\binom{n}{j}(-1)^jx^j \;\;\; (3)$

Case $m = 0$: Putting $x = 1$ in $(3)$ yields: $\sum_{j=0}^{n}\binom{n}{j}(-1)^j = 0$

Case $m = 1$: Differentiating $(3)$ once yields: $-n(1-x)^{n-1} =\sum_{j=0}^{n}\binom{n}{j}(-1)^jjx^{j-1}$

Again putting $x = 1$: $\sum_{j=0}^{n}\binom{n}{j}(-1)^jj = 0$.

Assume the $m$th step is OK, where $1 \leq m < n-1$. We need to show, that our lemma also holds for step $m+1$:

Differentiate $(3)$ $m+1$ times:

$(-1)^{m+1}n(n-1)...(n-m)(1-x)^{n-m-1} = \sum_{j=0}^{n}\binom{n}{j}(-1)^jj(j-1)..(j-m)x^{j-m-1}$

Evaluating at $x = 1$:

\[\sum_{j=0}^{n}\binom{n}{j}(-1)^j\left ( j^{m+1}+c_mj^m+c_{m-1}j^{m-1} + ... + c_1j\right )=0 \\ \\ \sum_{j=0}^{n}\binom{n}{j}(-1)^jj^{m+1} + c_m\sum_{j=0}^{n}\binom{n}{j}(-1)^jj^m +c_{m-1}\sum_{j=0}^{n}\binom{n}{j}(-1)^jj^{m-1}+...+c_1\sum_{j=0}^{n}\binom{n}{j}(-1)^jj =0 \\ \therefore \sum_{j=0}^{n}\binom{n}{j}(-1)^jj^{m+1} = 0.\]

Now we are well prepared to prove, that $(1)$ holds. This will be another proof by induction:

Let $S_n = \sum_{k=0}^{n}(-1)^kk^n\binom{n}{k}$. Then we have:

$S_0 = 1 = (-1)^00!$, and $S_1 = (-1)^00^1\binom{1}{0}+(-1)^11^1\binom{1}{1} = -1 = (-1)^11!$

Therefore, we may assume, that $(1)$ holds for some step $ n > 1$: $S_n = (-1)^nn!$

\[S_{n+1} = \sum_{k=0}^{n+1}(-1)^kk^{n+1}\binom{n+1}{k} = \sum_{k=1}^{n+1}(-1)^kk^n\frac{(n+1)!}{(k-1)!(n+1-k)!}\\= \sum_{j=0}^{n}(-1)^{j+1}(j+1)^n\frac{(n+1)n!}{j!(n-j)!}= -(n+1)\sum_{j=0}^{n}(-1)^j(j+1)^n\binom{n}{j} \\= -(n+1)\sum_{j=0}^{n}(-1)^j\left ( 1+\binom{n}{1}j+\binom{n}{2}j^{2}+...+\binom{n}{n-1}j^{n-1}+j^n \right )\binom{n}{j} \\=-(n+1)\left ( \sum_{m=0}^{n-1}\binom{n}{m}\sum_{j=0}^{n}(-1)^jj^{m}\binom{n}{j}+S_n\right )\]

With the help of our lemma, the double sum in the parenthesis equals 0, so we are left with:

\[S_{n+1} = -(n+1)S_n = (-1)^{n+1}(n+1)! \;\;\; q.e.d.\]
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top