Firecracker Physics: Exploding Directionality

  • Thread starter Thread starter wil3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the operational characteristics of firecrackers, specifically how the explosion occurs in relation to the orientation of the cardboard tube. The original question explores whether the explosion is omnidirectional or favors the ends of the tube when detonated. It is noted that when a firecracker explodes, the force is not significantly directed more towards the ends, as evidenced by the observation that firecrackers often split in the middle upon detonation, leaving the ends relatively intact. This suggests that the explosive force is more evenly distributed rather than concentrated at the poles of the cylinder. The conversation emphasizes safety, advising against attempting to create or manipulate firecrackers due to the risk of injury.
wil3
Messages
177
Reaction score
1
Hello, this question may not be appropriate for this forum, but I feel that chemistry people are more likely to understand the basic operational characteristics of firecrackers.

Say I have a standard obnoxious firecracker, like the ones that they sell connected in strings for your neighbors to detonate early in the morning. The firecracker is just a bunch of black powder in a cardboard tube, and the tube explodes when the fire reaches it.

My question is how the tube explodes. Is the explosion somewhat omnidirectional, or does it favor the poles of the cardboard tube? By that I mean, if I were trying to pry open a door or something (not that I am, this is just to illustrate), would more force be directed onto the two surfaces if the firecracker was inserted lengthwise or on its end?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Lengthwise.

Look up shaped charges. Firecrackers aren't that sophisticated but it's still interesting.

Don't try to make one. You get a horrible injury to yourself or someone else. It's not fun.
 
I assure you that I'm not planning on it :P

So by lengthwise you mean with its ends touching the two surfaces? As in, more explosive force comes out of the poles of the cylinder? That makes sense to me, because that's the way the expanding gases are more likely to go, but I thought I should check. Thank you very much.
 
if you look up at a blown up firecracker (the "blackjack"/on a string type) you will find they split at the middle, leaving the two ends more or less intact

so i don't think you would get more mileage out of one by directing one of its poles at your target
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top