First broadcast TV satellite's orbit

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbit
AI Thread Summary
The first satellite for broadcast TV, Telstar I, had an oblong orbit that allowed it to be in transmission range for only about 20 minutes every 2.5 hours due to limitations in transmitter power rather than rocket technology. Achieving a geostationary orbit would have required significantly more signal strength, approximately 400 times that needed for a lower orbit. Telstar's limited power necessitated the use of large ground antennas, which were essential for effective communication. The discussion highlights the challenges of early satellite technology, including the need for precise tracking and the massive size of ground equipment. Overall, the constraints of the era influenced the design and functionality of early broadcast satellites.
Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
I noticed on Modern Marvels that they mentioned sometihng about hte first satellite put up for broadcast TV transmission. I think. They mentioned it had an oblong orbit that allowed it to be within tranmission range for only 20 minutes every 24 hours. Why was this? Was there limitations back in the day that prevented geosynchronous orbits?

Maybe this belongs in the engineering area... but that place scares me.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Signal strength and launch technology. Telstar I and II were tiny and had very limited receiving and transmission power. The ground antennas were huge. A newspaper ad from the time:

96879628_a95cb1b8ef.jpg


Larger version: http://farm1.static.flickr.com/39/96879628_a95cb1b8ef_o.jpg

The ground antenna horn is shown in the lower left. That little spec near the rim of the horn is a man. This thing was huge! It had to slew at 1.5 degrees per second and maintain a pointing accuracy of 0.06 degree, per the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telstar" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The US ground station was located only a few hours from my HS, so we took a fiend trip to see it. Massive horn antenna!
 
It was probably 20mins every orbit (2 1/2 hours).
I think using MEO was more a funtion of transmitter power than rocket technology. Geo-stationary orbit is 20,000 miles so you would need 400x the signal strength of a 1000mi orbit. Telstar was very low power and needed huge radio dishes already.
 
mgb_phys said:
It was probably 20mins every orbit (2 1/2 hours).
I think using MEO was more a funtion of transmitter power than rocket technology. Geo-stationary orbit is 20,000 miles so you would need 400x the signal strength of a 1000mi orbit. Telstar was very low power and needed huge radio dishes already.

Ah yah, I wasn't paying much attention, 2.5 hours sounds similar to 24 hours! Well that makes sense, I didn't think of that.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Back
Top