First Evidence of New Physics in b <-> s Transitions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Barmecides
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Evidence Physics
Barmecides
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
First Evidence of New Physics in b <--> s Transitions

Hi,

please look at the following arXiv :

http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.0659

First Evidence of New Physics in b <--> s Transitions
Authors: UTfit Collaboration: M. Bona, M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, F. Parodi, M. Pierini, P. Roudeau, C. Schiavi, L. Silvestrini, V. Sordini, A. Stocchi, V. Vagnoni
(Submitted on 5 Mar 2008)
Abstract: We combine all the available experimental information on Bs mixing, including the very recent tagged analyses of Bs to J/Psi phi by the CDF and D0 collaborations. We find that the phase of the Bs mixing amplitude deviates more than 3 sigma from the Standard Model prediction. While no single measurement has a 3 sigma significance yet, all the constraints show a remarkable agreement with the combined result. This is a first evidence of physics beyond the Standard Model. This result disfavours New Physics models with Minimal Flavour Violation with the same significance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

BenTheMan said:
Yeah I saw this. This is a very important process to the MSSM, and the fact that it changed last summer (from above the SM prediction to below it) is also pretty crucial.

Check out the MSSM weather forcast papers, too.
http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.0487
http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.2012

but what you describe, isn't it Minimal Flavor Violation which seems disfavored by this measurement ?
 
There is a new ph paper on this Bs excess related to SUSY :
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0803/0803.1898v1.pdf
In this paper, they introduce R-parity violation to explain both Bs and Ds->lnu excess. The only problem now I guess is that SUSY has no more any dark matter candidate ?
They say neutralino decays to mucb.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Barmecides said:
There is a new ph paper on this Bs excess related to SUSY :
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0803/0803.1898v1.pdf
In this paper, they introduce R-parity violation to explain both Bs and Ds->lnu excess. The only problem now I guess is that SUSY has no more any dark matter candidate ?
They say neutralino decays to mucb.

But the lightest supersymmetric particle is absolutely stable, isn't? So if the neutralino is unstable what does it decay into?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
kdv said:
But the lightest supersymmetric particle is absolutely stable, isn't?

Not if R-parity is violated.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
12K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Back
Top