First Order Linear Homogeneous Equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a first-order linear non-homogeneous differential equation involving an input function and a decay constant. Participants are exploring the methods for finding the solution, particularly focusing on the use of Laplace transforms and variation of parameters.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the structure of the differential equation and the necessity of finding both complementary and particular solutions. There is mention of using variation of parameters and the need to clarify the nature of the input function. Questions arise regarding the limits of integration and the correct form of the particular solution.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants providing insights and corrections to each other's approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the integration process and the form of the solution, but multiple interpretations and methods are still being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty about the nature of the input function and the limits of integration, which are critical to the problem's setup. Participants are also navigating the assumptions made in their approaches.

Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2
First Order Linear Non-Homogeneous Equation

Homework Statement



I need to solve for e(t)



Homework Equations



Do I use Laplace Transform for the last integral?


The Attempt at a Solution


[tex] \begin{subequations}<br /> \begin{eqnarray}<br /> \nonumber<br /> \dot{\hat{{\cal E}}}(t) &=& -\kappa \hat{{\cal E}}(t) + \sqrt{2\kappa}\, \hat{{\cal E}}_{in}(t), \\ <br /> <br /> \end{eqnarray}<br /> \end{subequations}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> \begin{subequations}<br /> \begin{eqnarray}<br /> \dot{\hat{{\cal E}}} &=& -\kappa \hat{{\cal E}} + \sqrt{2\kappa}\, \hat{{\cal E}}_{in}, \\ <br /> \nonumber<br /> I &=& e^{\int \kappa dt} =ce^{\kappa t}\\ <br /> \nonumber<br /> ce^{\kappa t}\dot{\hat{{\cal E}}} + ce^{\kappa t}\kappa \hat{{\cal E}} &=& ce^{\kappa t} \sqrt{2\kappa}\, \hat{{\cal E}}_{in}, \\ <br /> \nonumber<br /> \frac{d}{dt}(\hat{{\cal E}}e^{ \kappa t}) &=& ce^{\kappa t} \sqrt{2\kappa}\, \hat{{\cal E}}_{in}\\<br /> \nonumber <br /> \hat{{\cal E}}e^{ \kappa t} &=& \int^{\infty}_{0}ce^{\kappa t} \sqrt{2\kappa}\, \hat{{\cal E}}_{in}(t)dt\\<br /> \nonumber<br /> \nonumber<br /> \end{eqnarray}<br /> \end{subequations}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex] \dot{y}(t) = -\kappa y(t) + \sqrt{2\kappa} x_{in}(t)[/tex]
If that notation helps.
 
The method I wrote above is wrong. From what I remember, your supposed to find the complementary solution and the particular solution yc, yp.

For the yp, your supposed to choose a form so as to solve for yp but x_{in} is some arbitrary function. What do I do?
 
It would help a lot if you didn't assume people will understand what problem you are doing. Is [itex]\epsilon_{in}[/itex] a given function and not dependent on [itex]\epsilon[/itex]?

Assuming that it is, you are essentially using "variation of parameters".
The homogeneous equation is [itex]\epsilon'= -\kappa\epsilon[/itex] which should be easy to solve.

Now assume a solution of the form [itex]\epsilon(t)= u(t)Y(t)[/itex] where "Y(t)" is the solution to the homogeneous equation. The [itex]\epsilon'= u'Y+ uY'[/itex] and so the equation becomes [itex]u'Y+ uY'= u(-\kappa Y)+ \sqrt{2\kappa}\epsilon_{in}[/itex].

Since Y is a solution to the homogeneous equation, [itex]Y'= -\kappa Y[/itex], [itex]uY'= u(-\kappa Y)[/itex] so we can cancel those and have [itex]u' Y= \sqrt{2\kappa}\epsilon_{in}[/itex] remaining. Since both Y and [itex]\epsilon_{in}[/itex] are known functions, that's just an integration,
[tex]u(t)= \int_0^t \frac{\sqrt{2\kappa}\epsilon_{in}(\tau)}{Y(\tau)} d\tau[/itex]<br /> <br /> That is <b>almost</b> what you have. But note that the integral is NOT a definite integral from 0 to infinity. It is from 0 to t (actually, you could use any lower limit- that just changes the constant of integration) and notice that I have changed the "dummy" variable inside the integral to [itex]\tau[/itex] so as not to confuse it with t.<br /> <br /> Instead of what you have you should have<br /> [tex]e^{-\kappa t}u(t)= e^{\kappa t}\int_0^t e^{\kappa\tau}\epsilon_{in}(\tau)dt[/tex] <br /> is a specific solution, to be added to [itex]Ce^{-\kapa t}[/itex], the general solution to the homogeneous equation. Note that changing the variable inside the integral makes it clear that you <b>cannot</b> cancel the two exponentials![/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Where is the sqrt(2k)? I think my approach is correct except the limits on the integral.
I didn't realize I was doing variation of parameters.

Then how do you solve that last integraL?

[tex] \epsilon(t)= e^{-\kappa t}\int_0^t \sqrt{2\kappa}e^{\kappa\tau}\epsilon_{in}(\tau)dt = e^{-\kappa t} \sqrt{2\kappa}e^{\kappa\tau}\epsilon_{in}(\tau)t [/tex]

?
 
Last edited:
Or is that not right?
 
Why did you use tau?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K