First Weyl Algebras .... A_1 ....

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Weyl
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the first Weyl Algebras as presented in Matej Bresar's book, "Introduction to Noncommutative Algebra." A key point of confusion is the operator equation $$[D, L] = I$$, where $$D$$ represents differentiation, $$L$$ denotes multiplication by $$x$$, and $$I$$ is the identity operator. The clarification provided explains that this equation arises from the product rule of calculus, confirming that $$[D, L]$$ indeed equals the identity operator, rather than zero. This understanding is crucial for grasping the properties of Weyl Algebras.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of operator algebra, specifically commutators.
  • Familiarity with differentiation and the product rule in calculus.
  • Basic knowledge of algebraic structures, particularly finite dimensional division algebras.
  • Exposure to noncommutative algebra concepts as outlined in Bresar's work.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Weyl Algebras in more detail, focusing on their applications in noncommutative geometry.
  • Explore the implications of the product rule in operator theory.
  • Learn about the structure and classification of finite dimensional division algebras.
  • Investigate advanced topics in noncommutative algebra, including representations of Weyl Algebras.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in algebra and operator theory, as well as students studying noncommutative algebra and its applications in various fields.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Matej Bresar's book, "Introduction to Noncommutative Algebra" and am currently focussed on Chapter 1: Finite Dimensional Division Algebras ... ...

I need help with some remarks of Bresar on first Weyl Algebras ...

Bresar's remarks on Weyl Algebras are as follows:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/6236
View attachment 6237In the above text from Bresar we read the following: (see (1.4) above)

" ... ... It is straightforward to check that

$$[D, L] = I$$

the identity operator ..."Can someone please explain exactly why $$[D, L] = I$$ ... ... ?

(It looks more like $$[D, L] = 0$$ to me?)Help will be appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
In the above text from Bresar we read the following: (see (1.4) above)

" ... ... It is straightforward to check that

$$[D, L] = I$$

the identity operator ..."Can someone please explain exactly why $$[D, L] = I$$ ... ... ?

(It looks more like $$[D, L] = 0$$ to me?)Help will be appreciated ...

Peter
Effectively, this is just the product rule from calculus, which tells you that $$\frac d{dx}\bigl(xf(x)\bigr) = f(x) + x\frac d{dx}\bigl(f(x)\bigr).$$ If $D$ denotes differentiation, $L$ is the operation of multiplication by $x$, and $I$ is the identity operator, then that equation can be written as $$DL\bigl(f(x)\bigr) = I\bigl(f(x)\bigr) + LD\bigl(f(x)\bigr).$$ When you hide the $\bigl(f(x)\bigr)$s and write this as an operator equation, it says $DL = I + LD$, in other words $[D,L] = DL - LD = I.$
 
Opalg said:
Effectively, this is just the product rule from calculus, which tells you that $$\frac d{dx}\bigl(xf(x)\bigr) = f(x) + x\frac d{dx}\bigl(f(x)\bigr).$$ If $D$ denotes differentiation, $L$ is the operation of multiplication by $x$, and $I$ is the identity operator, then that equation can be written as $$DL\bigl(f(x)\bigr) = I\bigl(f(x)\bigr) + LD\bigl(f(x)\bigr).$$ When you hide the $\bigl(f(x)\bigr)$s and write this as an operator equation, it says $DL = I + LD$, in other words $[D,L] = DL - LD = I.$

Thanks Opalg ...

Got the idea now ...

Thanks again,

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K