Fission vs Fusion: Which is More Economically Feasible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Precursor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fission Fusion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the economic feasibility of nuclear fission versus fusion. Currently, fission is the only viable option for power generation, as fusion technology has not yet achieved a net positive energy output. However, fusion offers long-term advantages, such as abundant fuel sources and reduced waste. While fusion is not yet practical for energy generation, it can be economically feasible in the context of hydrogen bombs. Overall, fission remains the more economically viable choice for current energy needs.
Precursor
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
Which nuclear process is more economically feasible--fusion or fission? I think it's fusion because it produces more energy than it takes, as compared to fission. Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Precursor said:
Which nuclear process is more economically feasible--fusion or fission? I think it's fusion because it produces more energy than it takes, as compared to fission. Am I right?
Right now the only economically feasible one (for power generation) is fission - we are still inventing a fusion reactor that gives more power than it consumes.
Long term - fusion has some advantages (unlimited globally available fuel, less waste).

Of course if you just want a lot of energy delivered - fusion in the form of an H Bomb is economically feasible in terms of power out for energy in!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top