Flame becomes larger with water mist

  • Thread starter Thread starter physical1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
AI Thread Summary
Spraying water mist above a lit lighter flame can enhance the flame's appearance, creating a bright flickering orange color. This effect occurs when the mist is applied at the right distance, allowing enough water to interact with the flame without extinguishing it. The phenomenon may be due to the mist cooling a nearly invisible blue hot spot surrounding the flame, which becomes more visible as it turns orange. Unlike wood matches, butane flames from lighters are necessary to observe this effect clearly. The experiment highlights the complex behavior of flames and their interaction with environmental factors like water mist.
physical1
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
When I hold a lighter up in the air with the flame lit, and spray water mist above the flame, I can get the flame to "enhance" and produce a bright flickering orange color above the original flame.

The water mist has to be sprayed at a certain distance so that it does not put the flame out entirely. Enough mist has to hit the flame though, otherwise the effect will not occur. However I managed to do it within a few seconds of randomly thinking up this experiment, so it is not that hard.

My first thought was that maybe my spray bottle had some contaminants in it that were flammable. So I washed it out a few times. I tried again and got the same effect. Washed the bottle out some more, and the same effect occurred regardless.

My second thought was that somehow the flame was attracting more oxygen from the air, or maybe the dissolved oxygen in the water was escaping. But that I doubt could have such an obvious effect on a flame.

When I blow on the flame with air from my lungs, the flame just moves, and does not produce an extra orange flickering shell around the flame.

I was trying this experiment because I thought about lightening, clouds, and charges, I just thought I would try lighting a cloud on fire, playing with a lighter flames, sparks, etc. I assumed that nothing interesting would happen, since the cloud should put out the fire - not enhance it. Plus, buying a lighter and a spray bottle isn't something that would win a nobel prize anyway.

Any ideas what causes this effect? I am still cleaning out my spray bottle in case there are contaminants :-)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Found the answer to this by experimenting at 4:35AM.

Originally in the flame without any mist being sprayed, there was an extremely light colored blue shell surrounding the entire flame. This is easy to miss since it is so light colored and nearly invisible. Nearly is the key. There is an almost separate layer of hot spot above and around the main part of the flame. It is a different temperature range and very hard to see. Typical pictures of flames show the hot spots of the flame to be only in the center and they failed to show us that there is actually a hot spot on the outer edge of the flame.

As water is sprayed on this hard to see purple/blue "hot spot" above and around the flame, that area then becomes orange in color. Orange is much easier to see than the original hot color it was. The water is cooling that hot spot.

The effect cannot easily be seen (or at all) using a wood match. A butane flame from a lighter will show it.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
15K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top